BillEsq wrote:yorost wrote:I figured he was just trying to force in another argument for 12.
Seriously if it stays at 10 ... i wouldn't be too upset.. increases the odds Bellarmine is added in Lacrosse.... My loyalties are 100% Bellarmine 60% Slu and 40% Louisville.
cm5yz6 wrote:You are really into this Bellarmine - lacrosse thing
Jet915 wrote:PAC-12 seems most realistic. Big Ten would be nice cause everyone seems to have a regional rivalry with a B1G team and fox owns 50% of the B1G ten network but I think they would probably crush us every year. AAC is top heavy but after next year, I don't think we want to play ECU, Tulsa, SMU and Houston.
cm5yz6 wrote:BillEsq wrote:yorost wrote:I figured he was just trying to force in another argument for 12.
Seriously if it stays at 10 ... i wouldn't be too upset.. increases the odds Bellarmine is added in Lacrosse.... My loyalties are 100% Bellarmine 60% Slu and 40% Louisville.
You are really into this Bellarmine - lacrosse thing
bmorex wrote:There's just no way a Big East-AAC challenge will happen. Neither conference wants to be seen/portrayed as the "losers" of the split. I know that it's obviously not that simple, but the perception will be that whatever conference would win the "challenge," won realignment. I don't think it's in either conference's interests to sponsor an event like that.
On that same note, I wouldn't want the Big East to play the WCC in a challenge either. IMO, the Big East doesn't want to be considered mid-major. Why set up a tournament with a mid-major conference? Sure there are some great WCC teams, but there are also some mediocre ones.
I think it's Pac-12 or bust. If you can't get one set up with them, just don't do one.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 26 guests