yorost wrote:They need to bring athletic balance more in line with student demographics for Title IX.
yorost wrote:This would still leave the conference two women's teams short, right? If someone else in the mix all of a sudden announces lacrosse I might buy into this. Until, then, Title IX seems reasonable enough. I do appreciate that you know your school's situation better, though, I'm not saying I'm convinced any of you are wrong.
thegalen wrote:yorost wrote:This would still leave the conference two women's teams short, right? If someone else in the mix all of a sudden announces lacrosse I might buy into this. Until, then, Title IX seems reasonable enough. I do appreciate that you know your school's situation better, though, I'm not saying I'm convinced any of you are wrong.
Affiliates can be brought in. If anything, this is being setup in advance as an offset for men's LAX and/or to close the door on football. Title IX just doesn't make sense because for scholly's we were already in compliance, and for rosters and spending we were well within range of other schools in the state and many schools in the country. Let's just say it's not a development than was really anticipated by much of anyone. Which is unusual. Also, there was a surprise announcement that a $12+ million dollar arena renovation would be undertaken along with the $14+ million dollar new basketball practice facility being constructed. Again, out of the blue and not in previous master plans (the practice facility has been talked about for years). Something's up.
Eight Legger wrote:thegalen wrote:yorost wrote:This would still leave the conference two women's teams short, right? If someone else in the mix all of a sudden announces lacrosse I might buy into this. Until, then, Title IX seems reasonable enough. I do appreciate that you know your school's situation better, though, I'm not saying I'm convinced any of you are wrong.
Affiliates can be brought in. If anything, this is being setup in advance as an offset for men's LAX and/or to close the door on football. Title IX just doesn't make sense because for scholly's we were already in compliance, and for rosters and spending we were well within range of other schools in the state and many schools in the country. Let's just say it's not a development than was really anticipated by much of anyone. Which is unusual. Also, there was a surprise announcement that a $12+ million dollar arena renovation would be undertaken along with the $14+ million dollar new basketball practice facility being constructed. Again, out of the blue and not in previous master plans (the practice facility has been talked about for years). Something's up.
Probably just trying to keep up with our $15M renovation of the Robins Center. Also, starting a men's lacrosse team on top of a women's lacrosse team would probably necessitate a total investment of upwards of $10M+. Considering how VCU had to raise student fees by $50 a head to pay for Shaka's last extension, where is all this money coming from?
yorost wrote:This would still leave the conference two women's teams short, right? If someone else in the mix all of a sudden announces lacrosse I might buy into this. Until, then, Title IX seems reasonable enough. I do appreciate that you know your school's situation better, though, I'm not saying I'm convinced any of you are wrong.
thegalen wrote:4) VCU has the largest endowment behind UR, GTown and SLU
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 29 guests