GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Matt Brown highlighted this, but some concern for our next TV deal is absolutely impacted by the new Big 12 TV deal. FOX has acquired more content (and TV slots) for not just football but also basketball for the Big 12. FOX has also acquired significantly more B1G games (football and basketball). Between Fox, FS1 and FS2, there are only so many windows to pay for and go around.
I think a split TV deal is more likely than ever right now.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Matt Brown highlighted this, but some concern for our next TV deal is absolutely impacted by the new Big 12 TV deal. FOX has acquired more content (and TV slots) for not just football but also basketball for the Big 12. FOX has also acquired significantly more B1G games (football and basketball). Between Fox, FS1 and FS2, there are only so many windows to pay for and go around.
I think a split TV deal is more likely than ever right now.
For the “A” package, ESPN gets the top four football picks each season, six of the top eight picks, eight of the top 12 picks and 12 of the top 20 picks. As part of the deal, ESPN also gets the rights to the Big 12 football championship game and the basketball tournament championship game. The Big 12’s parity helped convince Fox, whose package includes 26 football games per season that will run on Fox broadcast network and FS1, to do the deal.
DudeAnon wrote:For the “A” package, ESPN gets the top four football picks each season, six of the top eight picks, eight of the top 12 picks and 12 of the top 20 picks. As part of the deal, ESPN also gets the rights to the Big 12 football championship game and the basketball tournament championship game. The Big 12’s parity helped convince Fox, whose package includes 26 football games per season that will run on Fox broadcast network and FS1, to do the deal.
https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/S ... N-Fox.aspx
If their basketball agreement mirrors their football one then their Big 12 deal may put many of the top matchups on ESPN. Even if it doesn't, I think the Big East can compete for air time. The new Big 12 is taking a pretty big hit basketball wise losing Oklahoma and Texas. UC, BYU, UCF and Houston are no slouches but they aren't the brands OU and Texas are.
DudeAnon wrote:Hall2012 wrote:The only criteria that matters now is wealthy alumni willing to contribute to NIL.
It hurts SHU as we'll sink like a rock in this new age of college basketball, but reality is we can't compete with the Creightons of the world offering kids 6 figures to transfer anyway. The Big East needs to find more schools who can. Past or even current basketball success doesn't matter anymore, the schools with the most money (or at least willing to spend the most money) will rise to the top.
True, without the black market SHU will miss on kids like Isiah Whitehead now.
Hall2012 wrote:DudeAnon wrote:Hall2012 wrote:The only criteria that matters now is wealthy alumni willing to contribute to NIL.
It hurts SHU as we'll sink like a rock in this new age of college basketball, but reality is we can't compete with the Creightons of the world offering kids 6 figures to transfer anyway. The Big East needs to find more schools who can. Past or even current basketball success doesn't matter anymore, the schools with the most money (or at least willing to spend the most money) will rise to the top.
True, without the black market SHU will miss on kids like Isiah Whitehead now.
Lol if Whitehead was just going to the highest bidder SHU would've been nowhere near the conversation. Not saying they play the game any less than X and everyone else, just that they simply don't have the cash to compete in a world where it's criteria #1.
None of our coaches had an assistant go to federal prison taking the fall for him though.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests