Bluejay wrote:ChelseaFriar wrote:Volleyball in the northeast is horrible.
Why is that?
Honestly, I don't really have a concrete answer. My guess is there really just are not many organized "town volleyball leagues" for young kids. The better female athletes in the Northeast, depending on town, tend to gravitate towards soccer, field hockey, lacrosse and basketball. In some towns even ice hockey. Even softball in the northeast isn't very good in comparison to other regions of the nation.
And volleyball in the northeast for males is extremely rare...at least back when I was a kid. None of the high schools in my area had male volleyball teams (most did have female volleyball teams).
It's like looking at ice hockey and lacrosse. This is changing, but a large percent of the college ice hockey talent from the U.S. comes from the northeast and the midwest (probably dating back to the days when players relied on frozen ponds to play). Other areas are now starting to produce talent. Twenty years ago in lacrosse almost all of the college talent came from New England, New York, New Jersey and the Baltimore and Virginia areas. Lacrosse has spread rapidly and this has really changed. Lacrosse has exploded in areas all over the country. When I was a kid, the town lacrosse league started in 4th grade. The best athletes in my town played lacrosse, not baseball, which is shocking to those who grew up in areas that didn't play lacrosse.
I really don't remember any youth volleyball leagues when I was a kid. However, ice hockey and lacrosse were big for both boys and girls.