NJRedman wrote:They are so bad they are calling Frank the Tank a "Well known troll". Thats pretty bad. Can someone PM him and let him know about this place please? I like Frank, he has been pretty spot on with his commentary and reasonable predictions and explanations of realignment. I love his blog, and anyone who thinks he's a "troll" is probably an idiot, who knows way less than Frank in all things college sports.
I completely agree. FTT is the most well-reasoned writer on conference realignment on the web. They're calling him a "troll" because he doesn't agree with them. I'm thankful I have not received that type of treatment at this site. While I think this new Big East is absolutely awesome and wish it all the success in the world, especially after enjoying watching Butler up close in its rise to prominence in my years as an Indiana resident from '06 to '11, I do consider myself an ACC fan first. Half of my wife's family loves NC State; the other half, UNC. My family and I love FSU. I grew up near Clemson and live close to three ACC schools. Both sides of the family love the ACC and love to hate the SEC. Sometimes I have said things that aren't 100% rah-rah for the Big East (especially the old Big East), but thankfully, the folks on this board are well-reasoned enough to see it's not "trolling" or raining on anyone's parade.
Too often people do not know how to disagree without telling someone else, "You suck!" or "Your a moron!" (Misspelling done on purpose.) It's childish, and it's not worth getting in typing bout with people who behave that way.
As for the general vibe I've gotten from reading that AAC message board, it really depends on the fanbase. I do not get the impression that UConn or Cincinnati fans (most of them, anyway) have any ill will towards today's Big East. They surely would have preferred the Catholic 7 stick with them, but I think they get it why they left. Some of them are bitter at the C7 for "destroying the 'real' Big East," considering them backstabbers, but these people are the same who want their teams in the ACC/B1G/Big 12. If they fail to see their hypocrisy, then it's not worth wasting one's time on them. I have no idea where USF fans stand on things.
UCF, Memphis, Houston, and SMU are mad because, when they signed up for the league, they thought that Louisville, Rutgers, Boise State, and San Diego State were going to be in the league; it would have been a higher-paying, better-on-the-field football league. For hoops, the Catholic 7 and Notre Dame were going to be a part of the league. They feel rejected by the Catholic 7. Memphis, in particular, was really excited about Big East basketball, and they missed out. But they all need to get over it.
Tulsa didn't join until after everyone had announced departures; they even knew that the league they were going to join was not going to be called the "Big East." Tulane fans, few as they are, probably didn't care for the bluntness that one C7 president used when he singled Tulane out as the final straw for the C7's decision to leave the league.
ECU is kind of unique. I can tell you from having lived near many of their fans and listening on the radio that they feel they should have been in the league a long, long time ago. They're very proud of what is honestly an impressive college football atmosphere and a pretty decent football history. (Nevermind that they pretend basketball doesn't exist.) They know the Catholic 7 was a big reason why they were initially accepted only as a football-only member, and they blame the Catholic 7 as the reason why it took them so, so long to get into the league, all the way until after basically all the original football members had left. Their mindset is that basketball doesn't matter, thus there was never a valid reason not to get into the Big East. Meanwhile they acknowledge basketball matters because they see the positive publicity their new conference is getting thanks to UConn and Louisville.