Page 1 of 1

New York Times article - New Big East will be better

PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 8:57 pm
by Hoya
Great article in the Time (much better than the Post obviously):
After this week, the Big East will never be the same.

It will be better.

Syracuse, Pittsburgh, Louisville — good riddance.

Rutgers, Notre Dame — don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

For this basketball junkie, it’s a welcome sight to watch the schools that sold out to football depart a league that was founded on great hoops. No more threats, rumors or innuendos about leaving. Just be gone, now and forever. Let this be a time for rhapsody.

Georgetown, Providence, St. John’s, Seton Hall — keep standing tall.

Villanova, Marquette, DePaul — may you never fall.

Now add Xavier, Butler, Creighton — and just for rhymes — Saint Louis and Dayton.

Granted, the new Big East dominated by Catholic colleges will lose some terrific rivalries. The Syracuse vs. Connecticut six-overtime classic will have no connection to the reconstituted conference. And while there might be a little sympathy for the Huskies getting left behind, everybody knows they too covet pigskin prominence.

So embrace the change. Big East 2.0 (or at this point, maybe 3.0 or 4.0) is an alliance that will likely stick together for decades and have you forgetting about the defectors in no time.


http://thequad.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/0 ... -big-east/

Re: New York Times article - New Big East will be better

PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:52 pm
by BBPETE
ARE WE NOT THE BIG EAST...YES WE ARE!

Now there is an article with a media twist pointing to the future of the BIG EAST---a truly strong bb conference it once was, it is and will................could not have asked for a more fairly written aricle that describes the future with zell.

Re: New York Times article - New Big East will be better

PostPosted: Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:15 pm
by ArmyVet
In his view, stability = better. I can live with that.