yorost wrote:Yup, if they leave with 64+ teams they could setup a 32 team tourney that probably makes as much money as the current one does. All the games will be marquee matchups, in some sense, plus now all the money is funneled to their much more select group. I'm not sure they would have any reason to include conferences like the Big East. There's just not enough name basketball programs outside the power BCS conferences for them to worry about a competing tourney.
Hey, I'm not predicting anything, but I do think it makes a lot of sense for those 5 conferences to split and call their own shots across all sports. They could just declare themselves the top division and have all the championships in all sports. There's no worries about other teams just deciding to join them.
Again I agree. Although i could see them inviting the top few conferences with them. The BE does have quality names in basketball so it should make the cut. Plus you have to add a few teams for buy games "beat downs"
My guess is that you will see- ACC, SEC, B12, B10, PAC, MWC, BE, AAC, SB,CUSA for sure and maybe one or two more. The real problem with splitting with the NCAA has nothing to do with sports revenue and everything to do with Navy, Army, and AirForce you cannot split without taking those two schools. The service acadamy's get insane exposure and advertisement for the buck by being involved in the FBS football. This is equal to millions of dollars in advertisement revenue that the government cannot afford to lose. If any split happens without those three schools the Fed Gov will for sure step in and argue anti-trust, and since all of the schools in the big 5 conference are essentially welfare schools (we just call it federal student loans) they will have to bow down to fed gov wishes.