ArmyVet wrote:kayako wrote:ArmyVet wrote:Lots of speculation out there that OK and Texas could get out of paying if the whole league ending up dissolving, but the "losers" in the deal who get stuck in the Big 12 might be enriched substantially by holding things together with whomever they can.
Yeah, and tourney credits, too, and they'll have no trouble enticing top G5 schools because even in a reduced state, B12 does not have the Tulsas and ECUs to split the revenue with. AAC's P6 campaign probably ended with this, I think.
I always forget that West Virginia is in the Big 12 too. What happens to them? Only the ACC makes sense geographically, but would they want them?
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:The exit fees from Texas and Oklahoma will be just over $150 million, paid out through the end of the current GOR in 2025. Assuming Texas and Oklahoma are in the Big 12 through only this next year, that would mean there would be three years of exits fees to distribute to the Big 8 (remaining members of the Big 12). It comes out to, roughly, $19 million per school, just over $6 million per school per year. In the long-run those are peanuts. I liken it to the scene in Goodfellas, where Henry Hill is given a wad of cash from Paulie, after he loses his connections and associations. "Thirty-two hundred dollars he gave me. Thirty-two hundred dollars for a lifetime. It wasn't even enough to pay for the coffin."
I wouldn't be shocked to see the new Big 12 TV deal pay out below $20 million per member annually, with the losses of Texas and Oklahoma. It might very well be in the $15 million range, assuming it just picks up a Cincinnati or UCF. That, in turn, rips up the AAC TV contract and drops their value likely below $5 million.
GreatDaneAttorney wrote:GoldenWarrior11 wrote:We are moving towards both the SEC and B1G acquiring and consolidating all of the top remaining brands in college athletics. I very much see, eventually, the B1G taking the AAU PAC programs, along with the "Holy Grail" - UNC, Virginia, Duke and Georgia Tech - that was the original Jim Delaney vision. The SEC, in addition to Texas and Oklahoma, would eventually acquire Florida State, Clemson, NC State, Virginia Tech, Oklahoma State, West Virginia and a few others. What we finish with is two national ultra-conferences that replace the NCAA as the higher authority in governance and oversight in college athletics. This is the start of slicing off the non-valuable entities in the P5 - the Kansas States, Washington States, Oregon States, Wake Forests, etc. - and keeping all of the revenues (and more) to the top grouping. Between the NIL and the expansion of the CFP, this is all coordinated. We are likely in for a rogue wave of realignment that will make the 2010-11 cycle look like a kiddy pool.
I share this opinion wholeheartedly. The Big East is not totally "safe" like some have suggested. We're probably fine for a few years, but power is shifting rapidly. The Big East will want to watch very carefully and may benefit from making some aggressive moves.
I agree that the P5 is about to shrink considerably. Maybe not even 40 programs will make the cut.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:For the Big East, I wonder what this does for the Big 12 Battle. Do we look to opt-out? Or do we wait and see who they add? If they do add a UCF or a Boise State, I think we look to bail. Cincinnati or Memphis or Houston? Look to keep?
gtmoBlue wrote:heh, heh. Nothing is carved in stone Husky. I'd gladly see you go if we have a shot at some ACC outcasts
or KU/Baylor. Just saying, bro.
Husky_U wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:heh, heh. Nothing is carved in stone Husky. I'd gladly see you go if we have a shot at some ACC outcasts
or KU/Baylor. Just saying, bro.
Keep it up and I'll have Val replace you with Wichita.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests