GoldenWarrior11 wrote:This scandal is indicative of where we currently stand as athletic institutions under the NCAA umbrella. Whether it is Penn State, Baylor, Miami, North Carolina (or whomever in recent years), it is clear that many (not all) universities value the athletic brand and reputation above the school's mission and ideology itself. The reason why all comes down to money. They don't want to lose wins, championships, coaches or players because they want to create the strongest brand possible with the best possible individuals competing and battling for the school's image. Ultimately, these programs fight tooth and nail against any infractions because they want to protect their cash cow and maintain their status as power programs.
Louisville's President first response should not have been we are fighting all of these charges to clear our name, it should have been that the individuals that oversaw and promoted prostitutes and strippers in order to recruit and reward men's basketball players have no place at an institution like Louisville. Instead, it is protecting their investment and sweeping as much under the rug. They have already won (as a member in the P5).
Out of curiosity, when was the last time a current Big East member had a men's basketball scandal (was it Marquette a few years ago)?
sciencejay wrote:The latest on UL and UNC responses to NCAA allegations. This only gets more laughable: Neither school disputes the charges against them. They contend the NCAA doesn't have jurisdiction!
http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... power-ncaa
I have been concerned for a while that recent realignment activities portend a seismic shift in college athletics is coming--and sooner rather than later (Power 64/65 teams basically breaking off of the NCAA and forming their own union). If the NCAA comes out as weak and feckless in these two current cases against major institutions, then what's to stop the big football schools from simply forming their own collegiate athletics division? University presidents would sign on if they knew the money would be there. And media money would definitely follow the big boys, killing the BEast's current standing because without football, we'd be left out. Heck, it may even kill KU (if they don't get invited into the club).
IMHO.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:Imagine if the FB5 conferences do break away. Will their be zero oversight? I find it hard to believe that schools will agree to let each member institution individually just make and enforce their own rules. At what point does it cease being an institution of higher learning and just becomes a for-profit athletic association?
The Penn State scandal, all the nonsense Baylor went through, L'vile and hookers, UNC and fake classes, etc., etc. One thing that big money hates is scandals. Advertisers don't like when they are perceived to be on the wrong side of a heated public issue. It's almost better to have an organization like the NCAA (with all of their inherent faults) as the overseer, so schools like UNC and L'ville can apply pressure and more times than not, get the result they seek without getting their hands as dirty. It's easier for them to say: "The NCAA looked into it and THEY decided all was good." Without the ability to do that, you wonder if the heat and light applied from the court of public opinion would be brighter and hotter than anything they'd get from this jellyfish body that is now in place.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 39 guests