marquette wrote:Mea culpa, I whiffed on some numbers. That said, The fact that the BE made the 2nd most per team this year was still very much accurate as was the separation between the top 6 conferences and everyone else. I guess my question to stever is, in a post making no real point other than the overall positive direction of the league why play the Debbie downer role? What's the motivation?
The thing is, it does look a lot more impressive than it really is. The difference between the Big East and Big Ten is 390k per school. Divide that by the 6 years that it's payable and it's 65k per school per year over the next 6 years.
The way the units work- it values consistency. I mean next year(which is for tourneys in 2012-17)- here's the avg units per school per conference. Each unit is worth about 270k now...
1- Big 12 7.90- or about 2.158 million per school
2- Big Ten 7.21- or about 1.970 million per school
3- ACC 6.60- or about 1.803 million per school
4- Pac 12 5.33-or about 1.457 million per school
5- Big East 5.30- or about 1.448 million per school
6- SEC 4.71- or about 1.287 million per school
The NCAA set it up where 1 tourney year doesn't mean you get a ton that year. Much more certainty from a year to year basis. People see the articles initially referenced to in the thread and think the Big East will get that money like now. Pretty common misnomer with that.
Also- the point about the separation between top 6 and everyone else. Looking at the per school numbers- the gap is
6 SEC 1.287 per school.
7 AAC 1.266 per school
8 A10 839k per school
9 WCC 737k per school
10 MVC 655k per school
11 MWC 546k per school
so 450k difference between SEC and A10 per school.