Xudash wrote:DeltaV wrote:Expansion I would think would work... The 13 team conference I've heard mentioned. 6 home and away, 6 once. 3 permanent rivals, other three rotate.
Add Dayton (because we all need that annoying little brother), St Louis (so DePaul isn't the bottom team anymore), and Davidson (because f--- the ACC). Keep it private.
If that happens, you and Villanova can take charge of babysitting the Cryer fans. And good luck with that.
kayako wrote:Hall2012 wrote:Can't speak for Marquette as I missed their game, but for Seton Hall I'd say no. They had little to no trouble with the press. They lost because of 2 things that really have been issues frequently this year. 1. Poor shooting and 2. Carelessness with the ball in the front court. It wasn't anything Arkansas did.
We're 0-3 in nail-biters, so it's probably frustration in me speaking, looking for some kind of conference deficiency. Probably same with OP. But I do want to see a real physical pressing team in the league, as we don't have any.
DudeAnon wrote:Xudash wrote:I can virtually assure you there isn't one person in a decision-making capacity for the Big East that thinks the way you do about the conference's size or the need to expand now, based on what is available now.
How can you virtually assure me that? Do you have contacts in the AD's offices?
DudeAnon wrote:Schickrateez wrote:WSU should be considered. Our challenge is to stay relevant in a P5 vs everyone else world. We need more good programs in order to do that. If only Gonzaga and St. Mary's were a bit more east.
DudeAnon wrote:I think we can only stand to benefit from increased competition.
kayako wrote:DudeAnon wrote:I think we can only stand to benefit from increased competition.
Yeah, I agree with that. I think some of the posters have the classic last-person-in mentality. They want to shut the door behind them.
redmen9194 wrote:No expansion. We have a tight, strong league with great rivalries developing. We have great ooc schedules that push our RPI up. No one else need apply.
Schickrateez wrote:
Well, since considering VCU woulld open the public school box, why wouldn't Wichita State be considered? It's pretty clear they are looking to upgrade their conference and they would move the needle as much (if not more) than VCU or UD. That being said, no offense to any of the schools mentioned above, I still think staying at 10 is the best option for now.
Hall2012 wrote:Schickrateez wrote:
Well, since considering VCU woulld open the public school box, why wouldn't Wichita State be considered? It's pretty clear they are looking to upgrade their conference and they would move the needle as much (if not more) than VCU or UD. That being said, no offense to any of the schools mentioned above, I still think staying at 10 is the best option for now.
Because we care about academics and they make WVU look like Harvard?
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 35 guests