Bill Marsh wrote:kayako wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:UConn would certainly be an immediate boost in ratings, but they aren't available and as long as they have FBS football, it doesn't make financial sense for them. So what's the answer?
We can wait 8 years and see if Creighton, Xavier, and Butler are national powers by then. Or at least that's the vibe I am getting from some of the newer fans of the Big East.
I understand the thinking that Fox needs time to grow their cable sports network fan base. But the old Big East grabbed a fan base immediately. I know that it was a different time, but I think most products have their best opportunity when their new to the market. Whatever their first impression, they then tend to settle in to their niche and stay where they are.
My concern isn't just for keeping the Fox contract, but it's to have a product with enough demand that other networks are bidding for the Big East in addition to Fox. That's what will keep us on the receiving end of a lucrative contract.
Bill Marsh wrote:My concern isn't just for keeping the Fox contract, but it's to have a product with enough demand that other networks are bidding for the Big East in addition to Fox. That's what will keep us on the receiving end of a lucrative contract.
kayako wrote:Interesting. How sure are you about Gonzaga increasing our TV ratings? Admittedly I just kind of assumed negatively with the late tipoff times and the Spokane TV market. And I am assuming that they're willing to play in Spokane Arena or maybe even Seattle for a handful of their home games every season?
Bill Marsh wrote:My concern isn't just for keeping the Fox contract, but it's to have a product with enough demand that other networks are bidding for the Big East in addition to Fox. That's what will keep us on the receiving end of a lucrative contract.
Yeah this I can totally agree with. Hopefully the presidents aren't content with the little exposure that came with Nova's title. They need to be hungry for more. I'm starting to lean VCU (after UCONN of course), but I'm glad I am not making these decisions!
gtmoBlue wrote:If the Zags still want to join the BE, let them join. Also add St Louis to pad the bottom a bit. That's your 12 and you have added two good markets. The Zags will be immediately competitive (Overall: 31-1, WCC: 17-1) and the Billikens (Overall: 11 - 20 A-10: 6 - 12) will aid the middle of the conference with 2 more w's. It's a win-win. Fox gets more content, the conference gets 6-8 bids consistently, and gtmo waits for Duke to bolt from the ACC - "erobody's" happy.
kayako wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:UConn would certainly be an immediate boost in ratings, but they aren't available and as long as they have FBS football, it doesn't make financial sense for them. So what's the answer?
We can wait 8 years and see if Creighton, Xavier, and Butler are national powers by then. Or at least that's the vibe I am getting from some of the newer fans of the Big East.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests