MUWarrior1090 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:to say that Marquette at 9-9 would be a lock with a RPI of 70 is comical. They would need to win in the BET in what would likely be a game with Creighton I think. If they are 18-13, things would be really dicey for them. No way would that be a 50/50 shot.
The problem looking at the Matrix is sure they're in a lot of brackets.. But they are in a lot of folks 1st 4 right now where a loss or 2 and they are out.
Also, the one thing that would give me pause for Marquette fans quite frankly is the bracket reveal from a few weeks ago. The committee used RPI quite a lot in that.
If it's comical to say that Marquette would be a lock with an RPI of 70, why did you say in another thread that Syracuse is a lock when their RPI projects to 75?
3
I never said they would be a lock at 9-9. I said 9-9 with a win in the BET. I would be sweating it out big time at 18-13. And the committee may have used RPI, but they also made it known top 50 wins were very important and MU has 5 of those and would likely end up with 7 if they can get to 19 wins
Omaha1 wrote:So which fan base is least confident of a bid? I feel like Nova, Butler and Creighton are okay although I acknowledge my Jays are scuffling. We can assume XU is in too, right?
Among Marquette, PC, Hall - who is the least likely to dance?
Omaha1 wrote:So which fan base is least confident of a bid? I feel like Nova, Butler and Creighton are okay although I acknowledge my Jays are scuffling. We can assume XU is in too, right?
Among Marquette, PC, Hall - who is the least likely to dance?
EMT wrote:Omaha1 wrote:So which fan base is least confident of a bid? I feel like Nova, Butler and Creighton are okay although I acknowledge my Jays are scuffling. We can assume XU is in too, right?
Among Marquette, PC, Hall - who is the least likely to dance?
Marquette - Lowest current RPI and toughest schedule left.
JohnW22 wrote:Going to be interesting to see how the tournament committee weighs in on how Xavier did without Sumner but at the same time take into consideration the 3 games without Bluiett.
EMT wrote:JohnW22 wrote:Going to be interesting to see how the tournament committee weighs in on how Xavier did without Sumner but at the same time take into consideration the 3 games without Bluiett.
My guess is you get no relief for Sumner because you lost him for the season and would have to play in the NCAAs without him anyway. But you will get consideration for Bluiett because it was a temporary loss and he's back.
JohnW22 wrote:EMT wrote:JohnW22 wrote:Going to be interesting to see how the tournament committee weighs in on how Xavier did without Sumner but at the same time take into consideration the 3 games without Bluiett.
My guess is you get no relief for Sumner because you lost him for the season and would have to play in the NCAAs without him anyway. But you will get consideration for Bluiett because it was a temporary loss and he's back.
I'm not talking relief for not having Sumner. I'm talking them seeing how much worse Xavier is without him. Hoping they don't think Xavier doesn't belong because they don't have Sumner.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest