hortle wrote:imo the shortlist for expansion candidates will always include SLU (and Dayton) toward the top of the list. For awhile it looked like the league was going to twelve, with the current additions plus those two. They make the most sense geographically and likeminded-ness. Dayton probably would have leapfrogged Creighton in the last wave if not for Xavier pretty much accounting for all of Dayton's tv market.
hortle wrote:
Dayton probably would have leapfrogged Creighton in the last wave if not for Xavier pretty much accounting for all of Dayton's tv market.
St. Louis isn’t much of a college basketball market to begin with. While St. Louis University has had some nice seasons recently, that follows a drought in which the Billikens didn’t make the NCAA event for 11 consecutive seasons. Nielsen says 7 percent of area homes with a TV tuned in, on average, to the first four days of coverage that was spread across CBS, TNT, TBS and truTV.
Louisville is only about 75 miles to the west of UK’s Lexington campus, plus it has its own team still in the tourney — the Louisville Cardinals. That adds up to it being the nation’s top-rated market for the tourney. Nielsen said 22.8 percent of TV households there were tuning in through last weekend.
Dayton, about 135 miles to the north of Lexington, is second (17.3). Like Louisville, it also helps that the University of Dayton was in the tourney.
Cincinnati, only about 80 miles north of Lexington, was third (15.4) and it also benefited by having two schools (Xavier and Cincinnati) in the field.
Now 14 years running, count the Louisville TV market No. 1 for college basketball ratings. Again, it wasn't close for the top spot.
ESPN on Tuesday announced games airing in Louisville averaged a 4.9, listing ground zero for the Cardinals and Cats ahead of Raleigh-Durham (2.7), Kansas City (2.5), Greensboro-High Point (2.5), and Cincinnati (1.8). Other markets in the top 10 include Dayton (1.7), Greenville (1.7), Indianapolis (1.6), Nashville (1.6) and Memphis (1.5).
Bloomington, Indiana
Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Durham, North Carolina
Dayton, Ohio
Each year the NCAA tournament begins in the University of Dayton Arena, site of the First Four games that trim the field to a 64-team bracket. It’s an appropriate home, considering the pride and passion shown each year by fans of the University of Dayton Flyers, which is one of the premier programs in the Atlantic 10 and has won five NCAA tourney games the last two years. Since the arena opened in 1969, the Flyers have ranked top 35 in the nation in attendance every year, drawing sold-out crowds of 13,455 to the building on a regular basis.
Indianapolis, Indiana
The largest city in the Hoosier state has become a regular host of the Final Four (six times since 1991, and most recently in Lucas Oil Stadium). There’s also historic Hinkle Fieldhouse, home to Butler University men’s basketball. It opened in 1928 and underwent a $36 million renovation in 2014, seats 9,100 fans today and is frequently filled to capacity when the Bulldogs are competing in the Big East. IUPUI is another Division I member that competes here, as does the University of Indianapolis, one of the stronger programs in Division II.
Lawrence, Kansas
Lexington, Kentucky
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
The City of Brotherly Love is the home to six Division I basketball programs -- the Big Five of La Salle, Penn, St. Joe’s, Temple and Villanova -- as well as Drexel. It’s also home of The Palestra, known as the Cathedral of College Basketball. Every major college team has played there and the 8,722-seat arena has been the site of more college basketball regular season and NCAA tournament games than any other venue. Need more examples of the game’s deep roots here? These college stars are Philly natives: Gene Banks (Duke), Wilt Chamberlain (Kansas), Len Chappell (Wake Forest), Wayne Ellington (UNC), Michael Kidd-Gilchrist (Kentucky), Rasheed Wallace (North Carolina).
Richmond, Virginia
Hall2012 wrote:Actually, the Big East does care about those things. They've made clear that they are interested in a conference of "like minded institutions." And if you would bother to read, you would see the discussion was about long term potential, not present viability. Also, if you look at my statements you cut off when you quoted me, you'd see that I said they'd need to bring their basketball program to a competitive level. It's an obvious qualification, but one they're in control of, and if they do that, the fan base will follow. The financial situation is also something that they can get under control.
The points you mention obviously make adding SLU today a poor choice. My point, however, is that the school is basically the only one that had all of the uncontrollable aspects that the Big East is interested in. So I maintain, if SLU can bring it's basketball program to a competitive level, it has the long term potential to force the Big East to consider it should the league choose to expand.
BillikenFriar wrote:I understand making this sort of statement draws more ridicule than believers but......
I have it on excellent (very) authority that the conversations were SLU or Creighton for 10. It largely came down to the unbelievable fan following Creighton has and the willingness of their fan base to travel to see them. I have to think (just speculation) Fr. Biondi's well known difficult personality didnt help either. Remember, Jesuits know each other AND the Dominican center is on SLU's campus (oddly) so that means a majority of the presidents probably knew what a pain Larry was.
If expansion happens, will SLU still be in a favored position? Hard to say with the post Majerus crash. Still, big city team, private, great facilities and a natural Midwest rival for BU and CU. they may still look pretty attractive, especially if T Ford's spectacular recruiting continues.
SJHooper wrote: I have a feeling that teams like Wake Forest, BC, etc. will be left out of the major football landscape and these are the teams we will have to scoop up. They literally provide nothing to their conferences and they are getting tons and tons of money with FCS level football programs. There have already been articles about how they may get pushed out of the ACC some way or another. It can happen...maybe not soon but eventually.
Bill Marsh wrote:SJHooper wrote: I have a feeling that teams like Wake Forest, BC, etc. will be left out of the major football landscape and these are the teams we will have to scoop up. They literally provide nothing to their conferences and they are getting tons and tons of money with FCS level football programs. There have already been articles about how they may get pushed out of the ACC some way or another. It can happen...maybe not soon but eventually.
How can a team get "pushed out" of a conference? Serious question. The only way that I know is if they violate the by-laws or other condition of their contract.
If a conference disbands, that's a whole other matter. Right now no one seems to be anticipating that the ACC will disband.
TAMU Eagle wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:SJHooper wrote: I have a feeling that teams like Wake Forest, BC, etc. will be left out of the major football landscape and these are the teams we will have to scoop up. They literally provide nothing to their conferences and they are getting tons and tons of money with FCS level football programs. There have already been articles about how they may get pushed out of the ACC some way or another. It can happen...maybe not soon but eventually.
How can a team get "pushed out" of a conference? Serious question. The only way that I know is if they violate the by-laws or other condition of their contract.
If a conference disbands, that's a whole other matter. Right now no one seems to be anticipating that the ACC will disband.
I'm pretty sure most conferences can vote members out
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: xusandy and 29 guests