adoraz wrote:sheg wrote:So is the general consensus that Dayton has high revenue numbers because they own their own arena and play all their home games there? And that the numbers don't mean anything to the Big East?
I don't know what the methodology for determining net worth of the programs is. However, revenue has zero to do with who owns the venue. Revenue obviously equals (tickets x face value) + concession and parking revenue + tournament credits + media rights + miscellaneous. While attendance is easy to quantify, I can't imagine that things like concession revenue, parking revenue, seat licenses, donations, third tier media rights, shoe deals, licensing, and other ancillary streams are easy to quantify, especially from a private school.
As far "the numbers don't mean anything to the Big East?" probably not, other than "this program is financially sound." In other words, it's not a reason for inclusion - but it would be a reason for exclusion if a program was struggling financially.
If Dayton is ever invited to the Big East, it won't be because it makes pretty good revenue.
How does revenue have zero to do with who owns the venue? If all Dayton games are hosted at their own stadium, then they get all the revenue. Nearly all Big East schools play at NBA arenas for many games and need to split that revenue with the venue.
I'm not arguing for or against Dayton here. I'm just trying to figure out how their team value is so high.
Big 12 expansion is back in the news – though it doesn’t appear that the league has come to a decision on which schools it plans to invite to join the conference.
According to a report by Jason Williams of Cincinnati.com, however, there are three schools being thrown around as possible candidates.
According to Williams, BYU is the league’s first choice. But Texas, as we’ve seen, wants Houston. And Oklahoma reportedly wants Cincinnati in. So it’s possible that the league compromises with its two biggest programs – which means BYU would be out. Of course, this scenario only makes sense if the league adds two schools. If it adds four, it isn’t as big of an issue.
By adding 2 schools instead of 4, Big 12 doesn't crush TV partners financially.
With Texas and Oklahoma being the conference's two biggest programs, it appears the Big 12 may satisfy both interests by adding Houston and Cincinnati.
A number of other programs – including Memphis, East Carolina, UCF, USF, and SMU – have expressed interest in the league as well.
Fieldhouse Flyer wrote:Report: Big 12, Oklahoma, Texas At Odds On Which Teams To Add To League – 1 hour agoBig 12 expansion is back in the news – though it doesn’t appear that the league has come to a decision on which schools it plans to invite to join the conference.
According to a report by Jason Williams of Cincinnati.com, however, there are three schools being thrown around as possible candidates.
According to Williams, BYU is the league’s first choice. But Texas, as we’ve seen, wants Houston. And Oklahoma reportedly wants Cincinnati in. So it’s possible that the league compromises with its two biggest programs – which means BYU would be out. Of course, this scenario only makes sense if the league adds two schools. If it adds four, it isn’t as big of an issue.
By adding 2 schools instead of 4, Big 12 doesn't crush TV partners financially.
With Texas and Oklahoma being the conference's two biggest programs, it appears the Big 12 may satisfy both interests by adding Houston and Cincinnati.
A number of other programs – including Memphis, East Carolina, UCF, USF, and SMU – have expressed interest in the league as well.
Barley wrote:
But what about UCONN?
UConn could drop football (or move to the FCS) -- but why would they?
UConn isn't getting a lot of TV money currently and the state is in a ton of debt. Let's say they miss out on a Big 12 invite this time around. You could argue the football ship has sailed since the program isn't very competitive. So if they did drop it, or even went back to the FCS, then yes, they would be a perfect fit for the Big East.
Dropping football would be admitting failure, not exactly a common trait among politicians or collegiate administrators. It would also be giving up the Power 5 dream and all that money. And it would definitely piss off some influential boosters.
I just can't see it happening that way for the Huskies. And that means a Big East-UConn reunion probably isn't in the cards.
NJRedman wrote:A UConn/VCU expansion would be good for the conference. That adds two fanbases who will help us sell out MSG.
SJHooper wrote:UConn simply put, is a school that sold its soul for football and is on the verge of collapse. It's hilarious to me how they assume they will just keep winning in basketball because of the 4 titles they won recently even though they were ALL from Calhoun or Calhoun players. Calhoun's fingerprints are now gone, they are not Big East anymore, and boom they are pretty much irrelevant compared to where they were just a few years ago.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 47 guests