Fieldhouse Flyer wrote:11 – Connecticut ($ 137,900,000)
24 – Dayton ($ 80,600,000)
26 – Xavier ($ 78,100,000)
35 – Marquette ($ 59,600,000)
37 – St. John’s ($ 55,000,000)
51 – DePaul ($ 42,900,000)
52 – Georgetown($ 42,200,000)
54 – Villanova ($ 40,400,000)
73 – Providence ($ 29,700,000)
78 – Creighton ($ 28,100,000)
79 – Seton Hall ($ 27,700,000)
93 – Butler ($ 20,200,000)
96 – Saint Louis ($ 18,600,000)
DudeAnon wrote:The idea that Dayton is more valuable than teams located in NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., Milwaukee and Cincinnati is hilarious.
Barley wrote:DudeAnon wrote:The idea that Dayton is more valuable than teams located in NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., Milwaukee and Cincinnati is hilarious.
It's unlikely that anyone outside of Dayton believes these numbers have any value at all. Why Flyers fans come here to shove garbage like this down our throats all the time is beyond me.
Fieldhouse Flyer wrote:BEX wrote:
I wouldn't call the Big East AGM "secretive". It was a private meeting.
Fair point. "unpublicized" would have been a better word choice on my part.BEX wrote:
All their members were there and were under no obligation to discuss League Business with anyone other than among themselves. If you had a meeting and were developing strategy for your business, why would you want to share it with the world when you didn't have to?
I wouldn’t. The Presidents and Athletic Directors of the Big East (and Ivy League) have the luxury of complete autonomy in deciding among themselves what information they want (and do not want) in the public domain. It is an enviable luxury which will not be given away without all due consideration.
pki1998 wrote:
The idea that a FOI request would stop us from adding UConn is absurd. So the press can get our bylaws, and our meeting minutes. Who cares?
The Presidents and Athletic Directors of the Big East schools. By statute, UConn is required to disclose far more information than just its bylaws and meeting minutes. And the goalposts are getting moved every year, with more and more disclosure being required by the State of Connecticut legislature.
UConn Foundation Says 'Transparency' Bills Would Chill Donors – Harford Courant – February 26, 2016Representatives of the University of Connecticut Foundation made an impassioned argument at a legislative hearing Thursday that any law forcing them to open their records to the public — even if donors' name are excluded — would impede their efforts to raise money.
Daniel Toscano, a member of the foundation board and a donor, said the legislation under consideration, which would make the foundation subject to the state Freedom of Information Act, "will most definitely have a chilling effect on the philanthropy that is essential to building and maintaining a top-notch flagship university."
"As someone who has given significantly to UConn for more than a decade, I can attest to the fact that treating the foundation like a state agency will deter people like me from giving. Even if that is not your intention, I can assure you that it will be perceived very negatively by the very people you want and need to support this great institution."
Bill Would Require UConn Foundation to Reveal Donor Names – Connecticut Journal-Inquirer - April 23, 2016A bill that would require more public disclosure from the University of Connecticut Foundation awaits action by the House after clearing the Senate earlier this week. The Senate approved the bill 27-8, but not before amending the proposal to remove the Connecticut State College and University system from having to comply.
If approved, the bill would require the UConn Foundation, the school’s nonprofit fundraising arm, to undergo a second audit and release the final report, and to disclose the name of everyone who donates beginning July 1, 2017.
No one can say with any certainty what additional information UConn will be required to publicly disclose in the future.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------NJRedman wrote:
UConn is worth 100 times more to the Big East than Dayton or any other candidate.
Ryan Brewer disagrees.On April 1, 2016 sju88grad wrote:
Interesting Wall Street Journal article on the value of college basketball teams ... How Much Is Your College Basketball Team Worth?
Brewer studied 175 of Division I’s 351 teams, accounting for those in major conferences and others that have made the tournament in recent years. Brewer analyzed each program’s revenues and expenses and made cash-flow adjustments, risk assessments and growth projections to calculate what a college team would be worth on the open market, if it could be bought and sold like a professional franchise.
11 – Connecticut ($ 137,900,000)
24 – Dayton ($ 80,600,000)
26 – Xavier ($ 78,100,000)
35 – Marquette ($ 59,600,000)
37 – St. John’s ($ 55,000,000)
51 – DePaul ($ 42,900,000)
52 – Georgetown($ 42,200,000)
54 – Villanova ($ 40,400,000)
73 – Providence ($ 29,700,000)
78 – Creighton ($ 28,100,000)
79 – Seton Hall ($ 27,700,000)
93 – Butler ($ 20,200,000)
96 – Saint Louis ($ 18,600,000)
pki1998 wrote:The idea that a FOI request would stop us from adding UConn is absurd. So the press can get our bylaws, and our meeting minutes. Who cares? Meeting minutes can be as vague as the conference wants them. For instance, on expansion you could write something like “The league has considered expansion and has determined at this time expansion is not appropriate, the league will consider expansion again at a later date.” That will tell you absolutely nothing.
Barley wrote:DudeAnon wrote:The idea that Dayton is more valuable than teams located in NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia, Washington D.C., Milwaukee and Cincinnati is hilarious.
It's unlikely that anyone outside of Dayton believes these numbers have any value at all. Why Flyers fans come here to shove garbage like this down our throats all the time is beyond me.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests