stever20 wrote:JohnW22 wrote:Stever I think it's more the fact you use whatever stats hurt the Big East. You use different stats at different times and only the ones that hurt the Biig East. Many times you bring up good points and you do a lot of research but you tend to argue against Big East teams... A lot.
The thing is, a lot of times the extreme stats are the ones that hurt teams the most. Most of the times the resumes are very close... but take Syracuse who lost today. They are now 3-7 road/neutral vs the RPI top 100. The OOC schedules that the Big East teams had another one...
GumbyDamnit! wrote:stever20 wrote:JohnW22 wrote:Stever I think it's more the fact you use whatever stats hurt the Big East. You use different stats at different times and only the ones that hurt the Biig East. Many times you bring up good points and you do a lot of research but you tend to argue against Big East teams... A lot.
The thing is, a lot of times the extreme stats are the ones that hurt teams the most. Most of the times the resumes are very close... but take Syracuse who lost today. They are now 3-7 road/neutral vs the RPI top 100. The OOC schedules that the Big East teams had another one...
Are you using Syracuse's 3-7 road / neutral vs the Top 100 as something really bad? If so just an FYI UCONN is also 3-7 road / neutral vs top 100.
Tulsa is 2-6.
Cincy is 3-5
Butler is 4-5
So what's the point?
stever20 wrote:man this year is shaping up as a huge year with the brackets....
You have the whole Wichita St/Ken Pom situation. Don't know that there's been a more polarizing one than them...
but then the one that I think will be extremely interesting to watch will be Syracuse. I despise this from ESPN's bubble watch today :
On Wednesday, immediately after his team's 72-71 loss ACC Tournament loss to Pittsburgh, Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim admitted he didn't know whether his team would make the field or not. But he did argue that his nine-game suspension early in the season -- during which Syracuse went 4-5 and suffered its worst loss of the season at St. John's -- should be a factor in the committee's decision. Fortunately, the committee agrees. Committee chair Joe Castiglione has been consistent on that point throughout the season, and he reiterated it on a media conference call Wednesday morning. "In Syracuse's case, we recognize you have a hall of fame coach who has assembled his team, knows his team,'' Castiglione said. "To pretend he's not a difference maker would be a mistake.''
I'm afraid they're going to let Syracuse slink their way in..... That would be a total joke.....
Gopher+RamFan wrote:stever20 wrote:man this year is shaping up as a huge year with the brackets....
You have the whole Wichita St/Ken Pom situation. Don't know that there's been a more polarizing one than them...
but then the one that I think will be extremely interesting to watch will be Syracuse. I despise this from ESPN's bubble watch today :
On Wednesday, immediately after his team's 72-71 loss ACC Tournament loss to Pittsburgh, Syracuse coach Jim Boeheim admitted he didn't know whether his team would make the field or not. But he did argue that his nine-game suspension early in the season -- during which Syracuse went 4-5 and suffered its worst loss of the season at St. John's -- should be a factor in the committee's decision. Fortunately, the committee agrees. Committee chair Joe Castiglione has been consistent on that point throughout the season, and he reiterated it on a media conference call Wednesday morning. "In Syracuse's case, we recognize you have a hall of fame coach who has assembled his team, knows his team,'' Castiglione said. "To pretend he's not a difference maker would be a mistake.''
I'm afraid they're going to let Syracuse slink their way in..... That would be a total joke.....
Well, he was there to coach them to 5 losses out of their last 6. Don't deserve a bid at all, he was out as a punishment not coaching through injury. Ridiculous.
stever20 wrote:looking at bracketology from Lunardi- looks like it was done late afternoon/early evening..
Xavier 2 MW vs Green Bay, then Notre Dame/St Bonnie's- St Louis
Seton Hall 7 S vs Oregon St, then Oklahoma/New Mexico St- Oklahoma City
Providence 7 W vs Pitt/St Mary's, then Oregon/Weber St- Spokane
Nova 1 E vs FD/Hampton, then Wichita St/St Joe's- Brooklyn
Butler 10 E vs Dayton, then Mich St/UNC Asheville- St Louis
I HOPE Notre Dame isn't a 7 seed- that would suck for Xavier to see them in rd 2....
tough ones for Seton Hall and Providence- de facto road games in the 2nd round..... not to mention PC getting a FF team in the 2nd round again, which would suck....
Butler would have a tough 2nd game as well....
adoraz wrote:stever20 wrote:looking at bracketology from Lunardi- looks like it was done late afternoon/early evening..
Xavier 2 MW vs Green Bay, then Notre Dame/St Bonnie's- St Louis
Seton Hall 7 S vs Oregon St, then Oklahoma/New Mexico St- Oklahoma City
Providence 7 W vs Pitt/St Mary's, then Oregon/Weber St- Spokane
Nova 1 E vs FD/Hampton, then Wichita St/St Joe's- Brooklyn
Butler 10 E vs Dayton, then Mich St/UNC Asheville- St Louis
I HOPE Notre Dame isn't a 7 seed- that would suck for Xavier to see them in rd 2....
tough ones for Seton Hall and Providence- de facto road games in the 2nd round..... not to mention PC getting a FF team in the 2nd round again, which would suck....
Butler would have a tough 2nd game as well....
LOL you're so negative about possible scenarios that most likely won't even happen.
It's the tournament. All paths will be difficult.
stever20 wrote:adoraz wrote:stever20 wrote:looking at bracketology from Lunardi- looks like it was done late afternoon/early evening..
Xavier 2 MW vs Green Bay, then Notre Dame/St Bonnie's- St Louis
Seton Hall 7 S vs Oregon St, then Oklahoma/New Mexico St- Oklahoma City
Providence 7 W vs Pitt/St Mary's, then Oregon/Weber St- Spokane
Nova 1 E vs FD/Hampton, then Wichita St/St Joe's- Brooklyn
Butler 10 E vs Dayton, then Mich St/UNC Asheville- St Louis
I HOPE Notre Dame isn't a 7 seed- that would suck for Xavier to see them in rd 2....
tough ones for Seton Hall and Providence- de facto road games in the 2nd round..... not to mention PC getting a FF team in the 2nd round again, which would suck....
Butler would have a tough 2nd game as well....
LOL you're so negative about possible scenarios that most likely won't even happen.
It's the tournament. All paths will be difficult.
some are more difficult than others. You don't want to play Oklahoma period, but especially don't want to play Oklahoma in Oklahoma City. Same with PC. First off, don't want to play a FF team, but then don't want to see a real good Oregon team 2nd round....
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests