by xusandy » Wed Dec 23, 2015 10:16 am
This AM sees Louisville with the #6 KenPom ranking, just ahead of Villanova and Xavier (at #7 and #8.) Yet I see that Louisville has a NCSOS of #321, while both Nova and X are in the top 100 of NCSOS. Looking at Louisville's actual schedule, I see many stirring victories -- over Samford, North Florida, Hartford, St. Francis of NY, St. Louis, Kennesaw State, Eastern Michigan, Western Kentucky, and (just last night) over the mighty Kangaroos of the University of Missouri@Kansas City.
I get that since every one of those games was decided by 20+ points, Louisville's offensive and defensive efficiency rankings are both pretty damn good! And of course Louisville's only loss was to #1 Michigan State by 4 at their place. So I'm not disputing that Louisville is a good team, but I am just wondering how a pretty sophisticated computer program, developed and tweaked over many years by a team of genius basketball junkies, can spit out a result that puts a team with one loss and 9 wins over teams that aren't even in the top 150 (Western Kentucky, at #161, is the highest rated team the 'Ville has beaten) AHEAD of a 12-0 Xavier team, which has 7 wins, 6 by 10+ points, over teams ranked higher than Louisville's BEST win. Also, Xavier beat WKU by 31, while Louisville beat them by "only" 22.
As for Nova, they only have 5 wins over teams ranked ahead of the Ville's best win, and they have 2 away loses to top 5 teams instead of Louisville's 1 loss. Still, I'd take Nova's record anytime if asked to compare the two teams.
Bottom Line #1: The computer rankings ain't gospel.
Bottom Line #2: I'll take Kentucky in next week's Kentucky-Louisville game at whatever point spread is offered.