GumbyDamnit! wrote:I find this argument absolutely hilarious that fans of a program that hasn't sniffed the post season since this conference was formed, are expressing how disappointed they are in one of the programs that has played the most tourney games since it was formed. And questioning the contributions of the one team that has remained consistently relevant in the Top 10. We have done our part. We were expected to finish 4th in the league in 2013-14, not first. We ended up 16-2 and in the Top 5 in the rankings and RPI. Yeah, terrible job there.
Again, for all of you fans that are "disappointed" in Nova's representation of this conference, I have a suggestion... How about your team steps up and earns a one or two seed on your own and does some damage before worrying about how you've been let down by the standard bearer in this league the past 2 seasons.
And to be accurate my understanding is that none of us are collecting on tourney credits from what occurred in the old Big East. We forfeited those when we left the others. So according to my count Marq is currently along with SHU and DePaul as the only current BE teams not contributing tourney credits. When should we start that ticker tape parade?
billyjack wrote:stever20 wrote:Gotta love Villanova fan thinking that the tournament is meaningless and regular season is all that matters.
Marquette has delivered less bad press than Villanova has. What is Villanova known by these last 2 years? Picollo girl. that's not good.
Dimwits only look at the NCAA's to determine conference or team strength. Villanova in 2 years has non-conf wins over Kansas, Iowa, Syracuse, Michigan, Illinois, and VCU, plus Temple twice. And they've gone 62-8 over the last 2 years, and 32-4 in a Top-3 power conference, with a BET championship. And they continually add 4 and 5 stars to their roster.
stever20 wrote:billyjack wrote:stever20 wrote:Gotta love Villanova fan thinking that the tournament is meaningless and regular season is all that matters.
Marquette has delivered less bad press than Villanova has. What is Villanova known by these last 2 years? Picollo girl. that's not good.
Dimwits only look at the NCAA's to determine conference or team strength. Villanova in 2 years has non-conf wins over Kansas, Iowa, Syracuse, Michigan, Illinois, and VCU, plus Temple twice. And they've gone 62-8 over the last 2 years, and 32-4 in a Top-3 power conference, with a BET championship. And they continually add 4 and 5 stars to their roster.
If that's true, then why will every single thing written about the Big East preseason be about the lack of tournament performance. Every single thing. You can act like the NCAA doesn't mean much, that the regular season means 1000 times more- but that's not the view of pretty much every media member and all of the casual fans.
So tell me. Who is remembered more in 2014. Florida or UConn? 2015, Duke or Kentucky? 1987 Providence or Georgetown? 1985 Villanova or Georgetown? Of course- UConn, Duke, Providence, and Villanova- because they did more in the tournament. Folks think back in 1985 that Villanova had a great team. Why? Because they won the tournament. They had what a 9 seed? That means they weren't one of the 28 best teams in the country regular season.
You guys can whine all you want about the era we live in, and how the regular season is meaningless. But it is what it is. And you have Villanova 1985 in part to thank for making the regular season meaningless.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:
And to be accurate my understanding is that none of us are collecting on tourney credits from what occurred in the old Big East. We forfeited those when we left the others. So according to my count Marq is currently along with SHU and DePaul as the only current BE teams not contributing tourney credits. When should we start that ticker tape parade?
handdownmandown wrote:I'm almost positive Gumby is right.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests