gtmoBlue wrote:I see a very rough start to the season for X. With unproven bigs in the post and unproven PGs in Austin and Sumner - that exempt tourney will be a killer.
X loses @ Michigan, loses 2 in Orlando, and the Cincy rivalry game.
Things go south from there. If they can maintain cohesion and team chemistry, they could finish as high as 4th in the BE.
Since there is so much youth on the squad I see X battling with Butler, Marquette, and Prov for 4th - 7th.
Xavier finishes 5th over butler/prov - dances again.
DudeAnon wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:I see a very rough start to the season for X. With unproven bigs in the post and unproven PGs in Austin and Sumner - that exempt tourney will be a killer.
X loses @ Michigan, loses 2 in Orlando, and the Cincy rivalry game.
Things go south from there. If they can maintain cohesion and team chemistry, they could finish as high as 4th in the BE.
Since there is so much youth on the squad I see X battling with Butler, Marquette, and Prov for 4th - 7th.
Xavier finishes 5th over butler/prov - dances again.
Your credibility took a hit after you picked Creighton to finish 3rd.
gtmoBlue wrote:Don't get me wrong here. I like X - one of my favs to follow during hoops season, along with Lehigh, Quinnipiac, and Siena.
They will make the dance, but from the 4th or 5th (my take) spot.
Credibility? That...from someone called "DudeAnon"? Please.
As for my Creighton pick...I got a tip from someone who knows this lady in Philly, whose nephew works for the tailor,
at the Vatican...on good authority, no less. The Holy Father's book said it was a good bet.
robinreed wrote:I really don't think anyone can replace Stainbrook this year however we are so much improved at all other positions (perhaps less so at point) that we should finish only behind nova and G-town. Butler will be improved as well.
Frambo wrote:robinreed wrote:I really don't think anyone can replace Stainbrook this year however we are so much improved at all other positions (perhaps less so at point) that we should finish only behind nova and G-town. Butler will be improved as well.
I think Barlow's grit might be tough to replace and Butler's defense might feel his loss.
gtmoBlue wrote:With unproven bigs in the post
DudeAnon wrote:Some observations. People are underrating Larry Austin Jr. He will be the de facto point guard imo. If Sumner is as good as people say I guess he will take over and Austin will probably transfer out. But if Sumner is not then Austin is a very solid replacement.
XUFan09 wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:With unproven bigs in the post
Losing Stainbrook hurts, but Reynolds and Farr are miles away from "unproven" and O'Mara showed that he should at least be reliable backing them up. Heck, Reynolds could very well be first-team all-BE.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests