stever20 wrote:I'm sorry if I'm realistic. Xavier and Cincy were the same team for gosh sakes. The Xavier/Cincy game and where they got seeded basically proved it. Xavier won and was the 24 seed. Cincy lost and was the 29 seed. It's idiotic to say that Xavier was above average and Cincy was average. Xavier fans can bitch and moan saying they were so much better than Cincy- but that's just not the case at all. Any one who is objective in the least can see it. Yes Xavier got further in the tourney- but that's because they didn't have to see Kentucky in rd 2. But that's the benefit of winning the head to head game. So Xavier was slightly above Cincy. A team in that gets #29 seed to me isn't average. And with them getting most everything back, they won't be average next year.
And for gosh sakes, teams like Cincy aren't the enemy. It's the P5 that should be the enemy.
stever20 wrote:I'm sorry if I'm realistic. Xavier and Cincy were the same team for gosh sakes. The Xavier/Cincy game and where they got seeded basically proved it. Xavier won and was the 24 seed. Cincy lost and was the 29 seed. It's idiotic to say that Xavier was above average and Cincy was average. Xavier fans can bitch and moan saying they were so much better than Cincy- but that's just not the case at all. Any one who is objective in the least can see it. Yes Xavier got further in the tourney- but that's because they didn't have to see Kentucky in rd 2. But that's the benefit of winning the head to head game. So Xavier was slightly above Cincy. A team in that gets #29 seed to me isn't average. And with them getting most everything back, they won't be average next year.
And for gosh sakes, teams like Cincy aren't the enemy. It's the P5 that should be the enemy.
muskienick wrote:stever20 wrote:I'm sorry if I'm realistic. Xavier and Cincy were the same team for gosh sakes. The Xavier/Cincy game and where they got seeded basically proved it. Xavier won and was the 24 seed. Cincy lost and was the 29 seed. It's idiotic to say that Xavier was above average and Cincy was average. Xavier fans can bitch and moan saying they were so much better than Cincy- but that's just not the case at all. Any one who is objective in the least can see it. Yes Xavier got further in the tourney- but that's because they didn't have to see Kentucky in rd 2. But that's the benefit of winning the head to head game. So Xavier was slightly above Cincy. A team in that gets #29 seed to me isn't average. And with them getting most everything back, they won't be average next year.
And for gosh sakes, teams like Cincy aren't the enemy. It's the P5 that should be the enemy.
Stever:
XU 59 - UC 57 (XU winning with defense, supposedly UC's strength)
February 18, 2015
At UC's Fifth Third Arena
XU's 11th win in the last 16 games played in this series
Need we say more?
_lh wrote:UC was average this past season. XU beat them and went to the Sweet 16. Get over it.
MUPanther wrote:If a 9 seed of a ncaa tourament team is average, what is a NIT called?
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests