Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby Hoyas » Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:07 am

HoosierPal wrote:Unlike hoopstar, I have heard nothing in Indy regarding conference realignments. However, I agree that it is much better to be proactive than reactive. Adding some existing rivalries would be interesting. Wichita State and Creighton are naturals. The same can be said with Xavier and Dayton. Rivalries need passion, proximity and normally a history. Rivalries draw a few more eyeballs. I'd watch Duke v NC before I'd watch Duke v Louisville any day of the week.

With the Dawgs jumping conferences annually a few years back, it has been impossible to continue/establish solid rivalries. I guess we would suggest Xavier is our biggest Big East rival, but I am not sure Xavier would agree. Perhaps we could rekindle the SLU rivalry?

Until SLU gets their program going back in the right direction, I don't see how they can get added. I mean, can you imagine what the pundits would say if we added SLU right this second?
Hoyas
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:18 pm

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby R Jay » Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:08 am

hoopstar wrote:Boys, there will be major shifts in conferences the next 24 mos. The Play for pay will make a huge impact as will the TV contracts . Conferences including the Big East have to be ahead of the game and ready to go. UConn and Cinn looking at all options and more movement to come. The first two years of Big East was solid, teams getting better but Fox will need more product. Ratings rule the day and thus far not so good.

Dude, my crystal ball is never wrong. Neither is my Magic 8 ball. Don't doubt it.
I'm sorry to have to tell you this, but you've been duped.
“Even though I’m not playing I still don’t want my school to be disrespected, because I play for the name on the front of my chest, not the name on my back. I’m a part of this family now, and when they disrespected them they disrespected me”-Mo Watson Jr.
User avatar
R Jay
 
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:00 pm

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby BEwannabe » Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:22 am

SLU is worrisome because they're sticking with Crews and I don't see him attracting top talent because for a college coach he's old and a corn pone to boot. He was able to succesfully coach Majerus recruits because he's a fine enough coach but I just don't think he'll be able to have sustained success.
BEwannabe
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 11:31 am

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby DudeAnon » Fri Apr 03, 2015 8:46 am

BEwannabe wrote:SLU is worrisome because they're sticking with Crews and I don't see him attracting top talent because for a college coach he's old and a corn pone to boot. He was able to succesfully coach Majerus recruits because he's a fine enough coach but I just don't think he'll be able to have sustained success.


I don't think SLU's fanbase was ever that big even when they had Majerus.

On another note, with Shaka leaving VCU it is completely up in the air how their program will be in 5 years. More and more I think we are better off waiting 5 years to see who is still standing after the next P5 shakeup + coaches leaving.
Xavier

2018 Big East Champs
User avatar
DudeAnon
 
Posts: 3013
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:52 pm

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby BEwannabe » Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:08 am

Rick M had them pretty fired up. re: VCU - I don't think they'll miss a beat. Crazy fan base in a recruiting rich environment, if they get the former asst I think they will be solid.
BEwannabe
 
Posts: 384
Joined: Sat May 11, 2013 11:31 am

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby Bill Marsh » Fri Apr 03, 2015 9:58 am

DudeAnon wrote:
BEwannabe wrote:SLU is worrisome because they're sticking with Crews and I don't see him attracting top talent because for a college coach he's old and a corn pone to boot. He was able to succesfully coach Majerus recruits because he's a fine enough coach but I just don't think he'll be able to have sustained success.


I don't think SLU's fanbase was ever that big even when they had Majerus.

On another note, with Shaka leaving VCU it is completely up in the air how their program will be in 5 years. More and more I think we are better off waiting 5 years to see who is still standing after the next P5 shakeup + coaches leaving.


Why is it up in the air any more than it is when any program changes coaches? They won before Shaka was there and they'll win after he's gone. They have great facilities, a strong fan base, and have now built a solid tradition. They're fine.
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby DudeAnon » Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:20 am

Bill Marsh wrote:
DudeAnon wrote:
BEwannabe wrote:SLU is worrisome because they're sticking with Crews and I don't see him attracting top talent because for a college coach he's old and a corn pone to boot. He was able to succesfully coach Majerus recruits because he's a fine enough coach but I just don't think he'll be able to have sustained success.


I don't think SLU's fanbase was ever that big even when they had Majerus.

On another note, with Shaka leaving VCU it is completely up in the air how their program will be in 5 years. More and more I think we are better off waiting 5 years to see who is still standing after the next P5 shakeup + coaches leaving.


Why is it up in the air any more than it is when any program changes coaches? They won before Shaka was there and they'll win after he's gone. They have great facilities, a strong fan base, and have now built a solid tradition. They're fine.


Oh c'mon man, he was VCU. I am not saying that VCU was nothing but I know I had never heard of them before his Final Four run and nor had most of the country.

Image
Xavier

2018 Big East Champs
User avatar
DudeAnon
 
Posts: 3013
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:52 pm

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby Hoyas » Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:30 am

Capel and Grant had started VCU on their way though.
They were there for 7 years. Had 3 NCAA appearances. Had 1 25 win season(and 2 24 win seasons along with a 23 win season).

VCU had been to the tourney 3 of the 6 years before Smart took over.

And most of the country had heard of VCU in 2006-07 when they beat Duke in the tourney(and then lost to Pitt in OT).
Hoyas
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:18 pm

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby aughnanure » Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:37 am

Hoyas wrote:Capel and Grant had started VCU on their way though.
They were there for 7 years. Had 3 NCAA appearances. Had 1 25 win season(and 2 24 win seasons along with a 23 win season).

VCU had been to the tourney 3 of the 6 years before Smart took over.

And most of the country had heard of VCU in 2006-07 when they beat Duke in the tourney(and then lost to Pitt in OT).


3 out of 6 isn't some amazing number. The concern is that they are still relatively a new name to most fans, and don't have decades of history to sustain a bad hire. This is a perilous time, as it is a lot easier to fall down a peg than rise up.

But no one is immune to this, just some have a slightly easier time rising up after a change or a bad hire. Marquette got lucky with Buzz walking into a loaded team his first year. This time with Wojo is a lot closer to what should be expected when you have a major coaching change. So bringing back the experience VCU will will help the transition and perception of the program. I think they'll be solid, but will they be equal to what they were with Shaka or will it be more like the 3 out of 6 years?

Does anyone remember Southern Illinois in the mid 2000s? 6 straight tourney appearances. 2 Sweet Sixteens. Bruce Weber, then Matt Painter, then Chris Lowry kept it going for a little bit before falling down to earth and getting fired
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes to make it possible”
User avatar
aughnanure
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:54 pm

Re: Conference realignment discussion - v. 2015

Postby Hoyas » Fri Apr 03, 2015 10:48 am

aughnanure wrote:
Hoyas wrote:Capel and Grant had started VCU on their way though.
They were there for 7 years. Had 3 NCAA appearances. Had 1 25 win season(and 2 24 win seasons along with a 23 win season).

VCU had been to the tourney 3 of the 6 years before Smart took over.

And most of the country had heard of VCU in 2006-07 when they beat Duke in the tourney(and then lost to Pitt in OT).


3 out of 6 isn't some amazing number. The concern is that they are still relatively a new name to most fans, and don't have decades of history to sustain a bad hire. This is a perilous time, as it is a lot easier to fall down a peg than rise up.

But no one is immune to this, just some have a slightly easier time rising up after a change or a bad hire. Marquette got lucky with Buzz walking into a loaded team his first year. This time with Wojo is a lot closer to what should be expected when you have a major coaching change. So bringing back the experience VCU will will help the transition and perception of the program. I think they'll be solid, but will they be equal to what they were with Shaka or will it be more like the 3 out of 6 years?

Does anyone remember Southern Illinois in the mid 2000s? 6 straight tourney appearances. 2 Sweet Sixteens. Bruce Weber, then Matt Painter, then Chris Lowry kept it going for a little bit before falling down to earth and getting fired

I do agree with you about the ability to sustain a bad hire. I think the fact they have 2 guys who were assistants who could come back to the program with head coaching experience is very important. And I think them relying maybe a little bit less on Havoc could make them even better.

Where VCU is different than Southern Illinois is that the period before the run you bring up, they weren't all that good at all. So it was just a 6 year run there, compared to really a 13 year run at VCU.
Hoyas
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2015 10:18 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests