Bill Marsh wrote:Butler, a 68% FT shooting team on the season went 20-20. Wow!
Providence never should have let it get this close at home, on Senior Day. But given that it was a close game, those FTs were huge.
RedStormHoops wrote:You can't blame nova for just taking layups and wide open jump shots. St. John's fans had been debating all week whether or not we should try and win this game or sit people to keep healthy for the NCAA tournament. Lavin chose the latter and fans have to live with getting embarrassed.
I think St. John's will take this experience and with a full team beat nova this Friday if we get by providence. If not, oh well, but there's really nothing to say about nova running up the score. Maybe they took some threes when they shouldn't have, but St. John's is the one that purposely threw a regular season game to rest their players. They have to live with those consequences.
RDinNY wrote:RedStormHoops wrote:You can't blame nova for just taking layups and wide open jump shots. St. John's fans had been debating all week whether or not we should try and win this game or sit people to keep healthy for the NCAA tournament. Lavin chose the latter and fans have to live with getting embarrassed.
I think St. John's will take this experience and with a full team beat nova this Friday if we get by providence. If not, oh well, but there's really nothing to say about nova running up the score. Maybe they took some threes when they shouldn't have, but St. John's is the one that purposely threw a regular season game to rest their players. They have to live with those consequences.
Purposely threw a game? Really?
FDS wrote:Some of you St. John's fans are acting pretty whiny about this running up the score business. It is pretty simple, if you don't want to get scored on, play better defense. The game is 40 minutes long and if you only showed up ready to play 20..., shame on you.
ChestRockwell85 wrote:St. John's is adorable! In 2 games Villanova has beaten St. John's by a combined 55 points. Yeah, we want another shot at you as well.
Also, I was at the game, our starters were out with 5 minutes left. Enough already. I can't remember the last time Villanova walk-ons got that many shots.
You want to blame somebody? Blame your coach and his recruiting. It is not our fault you have no depth. We have COMPLETELY owned you over the past decade and it's not about to change.
stever20 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:Xavier down 1 at halftime.
Just was looking- the RPI to the minute is 44 for Xavier. Looking at the RPI- there's a HUGE gap between 48 and 49- 48 is Tulsa at .5816. 49 is Woffard at .5760. That's an incredible gap. Maybe X wedges in between if they lose today.
X won.
Tulsa's RPI doesn't include the loss to SE Oklahoma State. The committee will account for that and will drop Tulsa.
That's not what I was talking about- I was just showing how big of a gap there was between 48 and 49.
Tulsa is by no means out of it yet. They win tomorrow and get a win 1st rd of the AAC tourney, they're probably totally safe.. Or get 2 wins in the AAC tourney.
stever20 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:Xavier down 1 at halftime.
Just was looking- the RPI to the minute is 44 for Xavier. Looking at the RPI- there's a HUGE gap between 48 and 49- 48 is Tulsa at .5816. 49 is Woffard at .5760. That's an incredible gap. Maybe X wedges in between if they lose today.
X won.
Tulsa's RPI doesn't include the loss to SE Oklahoma State. The committee will account for that and will drop Tulsa.
1 thing I find remarkable. You say you are a UConn fan, yet do not want someone from your own conference to make the tourney fiercely. Just crazy to me. Especially with a newer conference- Tulsa getting into the tourney would be a huge plus for the AAC.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: stever20 and 17 guests