robinreed wrote:
Think of what the Big East would be with Gonzaga, Wichita St and VCU.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:robinreed wrote:
Think of what the Big East would be with Gonzaga, Wichita St and VCU.
For this year at least, I have no idea what to make of these teams. Gonzaga passes the eye test; they would be top 3 in the league no doubt. They've beaten 4 tournament-quality teams at least. But it is worth noting that 19 of their 27 wins came vs. RPI 100+. For some perspective Nova has 27 wins and only 12 of those vs. teams with an RPI of 100+.
Wich St and VCU would be in that SJU/X mix for 5/6th place at best IMO. Take the RPI # itself off the table and look at Wich St. and No. Iowa. They are examples of teams who have huge records heading into the tourney, but their resume's are paper thin. Wich St has 25 wins. 21 of them vs. RPI 90 or higher. Best win? Tulsa. Are you kidding me? No. Iowa has 27 wins, 22 of which came vs. teams 90+. Best/only good win: Wich St., who we have established as truly untested at this point.
VCU has at least played a decent schedule but again, best win? No. Iowa. So besides beating themselves, there is not much more to hang your hat on.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:robinreed wrote:
Think of what the Big East would be with Gonzaga, Wichita St and VCU.
For this year at least, I have no idea what to make of these teams. Gonzaga passes the eye test; they would be top 3 in the league no doubt. They've beaten 4 tournament-quality teams at least. But it is worth noting that 19 of their 27 wins came vs. RPI 100+. For some perspective Nova has 27 wins and only 12 of those vs. teams with an RPI of 100+.
Wich St and VCU would be in that SJU/X mix for 5/6th place at best IMO. Take the RPI # itself off the table and look at Wich St. and No. Iowa. They are examples of teams who have huge records heading into the tourney, but their resume's are paper thin. Wich St has 25 wins. 21 of them vs. RPI 90 or higher. Best win? Tulsa. Are you kidding me? No. Iowa has 27 wins, 22 of which came vs. teams 90+. Best/only good win: Wich St., who we have established as truly untested at this point.
VCU has at least played a decent schedule but again, best win? No. Iowa. So besides beating themselves, there is not much more to hang your hat on.
PorthosPA wrote:I just wanted to vent my frustration about Villanova and ESPN. I'll clearly be rooting against them tomorrow, but still. They are 26-2 in the #2 RPI conference in the country and they're not considered a 1 seed right now. Gonzaga passes the eye test, but Nova has a better resume top to bottom. Honestly, all Zaga has over Nova is 1 loss vs. 2 losses and a "better loss."
I've heard ESPN personalities say Villanova is underrated, because "they don't have the exposure anymore." Clearly, that is a dig at Fox Sports. Do you think the Committee cares about ratings? 5 more top 50 wins than Zaga and honestly, that number will most likely grow. I hope Nova gets a 1 seed (hopefully with 3 losses), so I can hear ESPN complain about a team from the WCC getting shafted in the seedings because of a team from the Big East. The irony will be absolutely the best.
I have a feeling that the Big East will get a lot more respect in the seedings than ESPN will care for. I just hope that our teams will back it up and make ESPN eat their words. Maybe they'll turn into the old BESPN if 2-3 BE teams can find a way to the E8.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests