marquette wrote:The A10 wasn't the former home to 7/10 current Big East members, nor does any team in that conference have the historical success of UConn, Cinncy, Temple, and Memphis. Furthermore, there are relationships between UConn-everyone in the BE, Cinncy-Xavier, and Nova-Temple that stretch back decades while only Xavier has a significant history with the A10.
DudeAnon wrote:Bring on Kentucky baby!
gosports1 wrote:marquette wrote:The A10 wasn't the former home to 7/10 current Big East members, nor does any team in that conference have the historical success of UConn, Cinncy, Temple, and Memphis. Furthermore, there are relationships between UConn-everyone in the BE, Cinncy-Xavier, and Nova-Temple that stretch back decades while only Xavier has a significant history with the A10.
not be picky but PC/URI have a history.your point remains.
how far back does st louis go with marquette?
marquette wrote:The A10 wasn't the former home to 7/10 current Big East members, nor does any team in that conference have the historical success of UConn, Cinncy, Temple, and Memphis. Furthermore, there are relationships between UConn-everyone in the BE, Cinncy-Xavier, and Nova-Temple that stretch back decades while only Xavier has a significant history with the A10.
gosports1 wrote:marquette wrote:The A10 wasn't the former home to 7/10 current Big East members, nor does any team in that conference have the historical success of UConn, Cinncy, Temple, and Memphis. Furthermore, there are relationships between UConn-everyone in the BE, Cinncy-Xavier, and Nova-Temple that stretch back decades while only Xavier has a significant history with the A10.
not be picky but PC/URI have a history.your point remains.
how far back does st louis go with marquette?
gavitspeaks wrote:marquette wrote:The A10 wasn't the former home to 7/10 current Big East members, nor does any team in that conference have the historical success of UConn, Cinncy, Temple, and Memphis. Furthermore, there are relationships between UConn-everyone in the BE, Cinncy-Xavier, and Nova-Temple that stretch back decades while only Xavier has a significant history with the A10.
Remind us all again what historical success Cincy and Temple and Memphis all have that is so phenomenal when speaking comparatively to other schools? How are you defining historical?
BEX wrote:Temple joined the A-10 in '82, Xavier '95. One wonders where Dayton would finish with Temple, Butler and Xavier still in the conference and with their recent add of G Mason, etc..
murphy wrote:BEX wrote:Temple joined the A-10 in '82, Xavier '95. One wonders where Dayton would finish with Temple, Butler and Xavier still in the conference and with their recent add of G Mason, etc..
Not totally sure where they would end up in the A10 standings with Temple and XU back in the A10, but we can look at their run against the power conference elite in the tourney last year, beat Ohio State, beat UCON, beat Stanford, and current w/l is 20-5. Draw you own conclusions
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], stever20 and 9 guests