Mon Feb 16th, 2G, Seton-VU, Butler-Creighton...

[RDinNY]

The push was a good call. From behind with the guy in the air, it doesn't take much to throw him off balance and potentially injure a player. It will be called everytime.

[chicagojayfan]

The push was a good call. From behind with the guy in the air, it doesn't take much to throw him off balance and potentially injure a player. It will be called everytime.

He didn't touch him. Next time maybe he should him in the damn seats if they are going to call "proximity" fouls

And I suppose it isn't dangerous for the 6-10 post player to flatten our PG in the final second?

[cufan10]

The push was a good call. From behind with the guy in the air, it doesn't take much to throw him off balance and potentially injure a player. It will be called everytime.

Except for the fact that he did not touch him, assuming we are talking about the same and 1 play.

[Jet915]

Great game, horrible reffing.

[Bulldawg]

The push was a good call. From behind with the guy in the air, it doesn't take much to throw him off balance and potentially injure a player. It will be called everytime.

He didn't touch him. Next time maybe he should him in the damn seats if they are going to call "proximity" fouls

And I suppose it isn't dangerous for the 6-10 post player to flatten our PG in the final second?

I think the tap on Barlow on the layup can go either way, its a good call because of potential injuries, but at the same time the shot was practically down by the time the foul took place.

As for that screen, if anything that was a moving screen, he moved right into Woods and any ref is not going to call something that stupid late into the game.

[chicagojayfan]

The push was a good call. From behind with the guy in the air, it doesn't take much to throw him off balance and potentially injure a player. It will be called everytime.

He didn't touch him. Next time maybe he should him in the damn seats if they are going to call "proximity" fouls

And I suppose it isn't dangerous for the 6-10 post player to flatten our PG in the final second?

I think the tap on Barlow on the layup can go either way, its a good call because of potential injuries, but at the same time the shot was practically down by the time the foul took place.

As for that screen, if anything that was a moving screen, he moved right into Woods and any ref is not going to call something that stupid late into the game.

there was NO tap

it was OBVIOUS in the replay

[Bulldawg]

I think the tap on Barlow on the layup can go either way, its a good call because of potential injuries, but at the same time the shot was practically down by the time the foul took place.

As for that screen, if anything that was a moving screen, he moved right into Woods and any ref is not going to call something that stupid late into the game.[/quote]


there was NO tap

it was OBVIOUS in the replay[/quote]

There was definitely a tap. Might want to check your prescription bud.

[cufan10]

I think the tap on Barlow on the layup can go either way, its a good call because of potential injuries, but at the same time the shot was practically down by the time the foul took place.

As for that screen, if anything that was a moving screen, he moved right into Woods and any ref is not going to call something that stupid late into the game.[/quote]


there was NO tap

it was OBVIOUS in the replay[/quote]

Yeah, I am surprised people are defending a foul call where the player literally did not touch the guy. I kinda feel like I watched a different game or something.

[chicagojayfan]

I think the tap on Barlow on the layup can go either way, its a good call because of potential injuries, but at the same time the shot was practically down by the time the foul took place.

As for that screen, if anything that was a moving screen, he moved right into Woods and any ref is not going to call something that stupid late into the game.

there was NO tap

it was OBVIOUS in the replay[/quote]

There was definitely a tap. Might want to check your prescription bud.[/quote]

might want to check your glasses.. no touch.

and why shouldn't there be a call on someone getting slammed to the court in the last seconds... where is that in the rule book is that a non call?

Go home and give thinks to the refs for a gift tonight.

[cufan10]

I think the tap on Barlow on the layup can go either way, its a good call because of potential injuries, but at the same time the shot was practically down by the time the foul took place.

As for that screen, if anything that was a moving screen, he moved right into Woods and any ref is not going to call something that stupid late into the game.

there was NO tap

it was OBVIOUS in the replay[/quote]

There was definitely a tap. Might want to check your prescription bud.[/quote]

Nice try, I was watching on a 42ish inch tv there was without a doubt no tap. Come on man, I know you are a butler fan but just admit your team got a free one there. As well as the block that was a clear charge.