TheBall wrote:We could be down to just 4 bids if xavier, st john's and seton hall don't step it up.
Hall2012 wrote:stever20 wrote:Hall2012 wrote:Lunardi still has both Hall and X in his field today despite the bad losses they picked up this week. They took some seed damage though, and 9 and 11. Johnnies slip to the 1st 4 out, leaving the BE with 6 teams in at the moment.
seems about right. Xavier next to last bye team. Seton Hall a 9 sounds high but looking at teams, not really....
Just wish PC didn't have those bad losses.
agreed. hopefully their tourney fate doesn't come down to something this nit-picky but when compared to another team with similar bad losses, do you think SHU's 2 being to the same opponent will be looked at more or less favorably than someone who lost them to 2 different opponents?
Bill Marsh wrote:TheBall wrote:We could be down to just 4 bids if xavier, st john's and seton hall don't step it up.
The Big East has already established it's place in the pecking order for this season. If OOC wins were currency, then the Vig East teams are now sitting around the poker table and are simply dividing up the same pile of cash, shifting it from one ember to another.
If the BE gets only 4 bids, it will mean that the top 4 teams have run away from the rest of the league, have stockpiled all the cash for themselves, and will all get very high seeds. More likely is that we still get 5-7 bids. There's no way for the ?Big east to lose it's standing relative to other conferences at this point! which means that individual teams will still stack up very well.
Bottom line is that someone's going to win the remaining games.
billyjack wrote:Seton Hall, Xavier, and even St John's are in much better shape that many here think. I think because each of them lost this week, our perception is that they're in bad shape. With as many bumps as SJU for example has hit, their RPI is still in the 40's, and XU and SHU are in the 30's-40's.
A week ago, there were several non-BE teams that were getting attention, but also hit bumps, and have nose-dived... Davidson, Miami, NC State, St Mary's, Washington, Kansas State... these guys and others are on thin ice. And what teams have replaced them...? UMass, Richmond, Illinois...? A bunch of teams that will also certainly collapse. Tulsa and Temple are 2 others that a week from now could follow Davidson out of the picture.
The key is that you can't say "St John's lost at Butler, so now they're toast"... because someone has to replace their spot... who...? Each of their fellow bubble teams has worse warts, but lack SJU's positives.
billyjack wrote:Seton Hall, Xavier, and even St John's are in much better shape that many here think. I think because each of them lost this week, our perception is that they're in bad shape. With as many bumps as SJU for example has hit, their RPI is still in the 40's, and XU and SHU are in the 30's-40's.
A week ago, there were several non-BE teams that were getting attention, but also hit bumps, and have nose-dived... Davidson, Miami, NC State, St Mary's, Washington, Kansas State... these guys and others are on thin ice. And what teams have replaced them...? UMass, Richmond, Illinois...? A bunch of teams that will also certainly collapse. Tulsa and Temple are 2 others that a week from now could follow Davidson out of the picture.
The key is that you can't say "St John's lost at Butler, so now they're toast"... because someone has to replace their spot... who...? Each of their fellow bubble teams has worse warts, but lack SJU's positives.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests