gtmoBlue wrote:What's done is done. However, a 14 team BE is best.
Add Duke, Wake Forest, Temple or Memphis, and the Zags.
Would be a great conference.
mel ott wrote:HoopDreams wrote:
We should have added Gonzaga. I worry about recruiting for CU. Omaha does not help the league in anyway in terms of national exposure and recruiting. McBuckets is a once in a lifetime recruit for a program and he was only there because of daddy.
Don't take the bait from this troll. I think most of these responses are pretty much on track. We don't have a go to guy and we would have 2-4 wins so far if we did. Mac is a great coach. Chatman has dropped off after the preseason (which I didn't expect), Hanson hasn't shown the promise we saw last year (though I think he still will prove it), and Zierden getting hurt (again) doesn't help. However, Mac did recruit well for the transition. The two transfers in PG Watson ( who was top 100 out of hs and at Boston U ) and Cole Huff (transfer from Nevada) were both targeted by 10-20 top BCS teams. They have proven themselves on the court and wanted to play at the next level. As stated, we got 3 recruits coming in next year including top 50-60 player in 6"11 center Patton from Omaha. He blew up in the AAU circuit but CU had him committed early. Our returning guys with Hanson, Hegner, Zierden are solid and we will look a lot differnt next year with their growth and the transfers. Even in this tough year, I love watching the Big East games on Fox Sports 1! Knowing these teams makes it so much more fun to watch them when they come to town.
CU will be fine and as more recruits see what Creighton and Omaha have to offer. I think things look good. The staff realized the jump up would be tough for a bit, but no one thought it would be like this for the year.
HoopDreams wrote:mel ott wrote:HoopDreams wrote:
We should have added Gonzaga. I worry about recruiting for CU. Omaha does not help the league in anyway in terms of national exposure and recruiting. McBuckets is a once in a lifetime recruit for a program and he was only there because of daddy.
Don't take the bait from this troll. I think most of these responses are pretty much on track. We don't have a go to guy and we would have 2-4 wins so far if we did. Mac is a great coach. Chatman has dropped off after the preseason (which I didn't expect), Hanson hasn't shown the promise we saw last year (though I think he still will prove it), and Zierden getting hurt (again) doesn't help. However, Mac did recruit well for the transition. The two transfers in PG Watson ( who was top 100 out of hs and at Boston U ) and Cole Huff (transfer from Nevada) were both targeted by 10-20 top BCS teams. They have proven themselves on the court and wanted to play at the next level. As stated, we got 3 recruits coming in next year including top 50-60 player in 6"11 center Patton from Omaha. He blew up in the AAU circuit but CU had him committed early. Our returning guys with Hanson, Hegner, Zierden are solid and we will look a lot differnt next year with their growth and the transfers. Even in this tough year, I love watching the Big East games on Fox Sports 1! Knowing these teams makes it so much more fun to watch them when they come to town.
CU will be fine and as more recruits see what Creighton and Omaha have to offer. I think things look good. The staff realized the jump up would be tough for a bit, but no one thought it would be like this for the year.
Not trying to troll... just giving an honest and logical opinion. The Big East made their bed with DePaul and has paid for it. Regardless, I want our conference to be the most balanced and competitive in the country and I want CU to succeed. But I have to admit... What I have seen thus far from CU in conference play is far too familiar as a DePaul fan and I know how much is sucks. I've seen CU fans on this site quick to bash DePaul and I think they are finally realizing what a mans league this is and if you don't have all the horses you will get exposed badly.
ChelseaFriar wrote:Jet915 wrote:Harrell is a top 100 recruit but is redshirting due to his lack of size so the verdict is still out on him.
Didn't realize this. Seems pretty unusual to redshirt a Top 100 but I'm sure they had their reasons.
Keno Davis used to redshirt a lot at PC. It worked out great with Kadeem Batts. The reason I don't love it now is because of the 5th year transfer rule (not saying this will happen with Harrell, but it's something for coaches to think about).
HoopDreams wrote:We should have added Gonzaga. I worry about recruiting for CU. Omaha does not help the league in anyway in terms of national exposure and recruiting. McBuckets is a once in a lifetime recruit for a program and he was only there because of daddy.
ChelseaFriar wrote:Jet915 wrote:Harrell is a top 100 recruit but is redshirting due to his lack of size so the verdict is still out on him.
Didn't realize this. Seems pretty unusual to redshirt a Top 100 but I'm sure they had their reasons.
Keno Davis used to redshirt a lot at PC. It worked out great with Kadeem Batts. The reason I don't love it now is because of the 5th year transfer rule (not saying this will happen with Harrell, but it's something for coaches to think about).
FlyJays wrote:ChelseaFriar wrote:Jet915 wrote:Harrell is a top 100 recruit but is redshirting due to his lack of size so the verdict is still out on him.
Didn't realize this. Seems pretty unusual to redshirt a Top 100 but I'm sure they had their reasons.
Keno Davis used to redshirt a lot at PC. It worked out great with Kadeem Batts. The reason I don't love it now is because of the 5th year transfer rule (not saying this will happen with Harrell, but it's something for coaches to think about).
Yep. It was an interesting move, but I think one that nearly everyone agrees was the right call. He's a wiry 6-8 SG who needed to add weight. I'm thankful they didn't use a year of his eligibility this season, given the way it's gone. Frankly, I wish they would've redshirted Gilmore as well. Next season, the Jays will have the most talented roster (on paper) they've ever had.
Patton (top 50) - C
Harrell (top 100) - SG
Watson Jr.(top 100) - PG
Gilmore (top 100) - SF/PF
Huff (all Mountain West as a Soph.) - SF/PF
There has never ever been a point where we've had four top-100 guys on the active roster. Frankly, I'm not sure there's ever been a point where we had more than one, given that we were recruiting to the Missouri Valley. And by all accounts, Huff may be the best player on our roster right now. That is a big reason the fan base isn't in total meltdown mode this season. We know there is help on the way. It may not be a top-3 Big East roster next season, but we will see a raw talent upgrade at literally every position, and should be competitive.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests