NJRedman wrote:Xudash wrote:HoosierPal wrote:I had to go to Spokane WA on business this week. First note: It takes FOREVER to get there. From Indy you have the options of Chicago, Minny, or Denver to catch a connecting flight. A short 7 hours later, you are in Spokane. I pity the 6'6" volleyball players that would have to ride commercial from any airport east of the Mississippi to Spokane.
I took the time to drive through Gonzaga's campus. It is a non-descript campus to say the least. If you are looking for an 'attractive campus' don't look at Gonzaga. By far the most impressive structure on campus was the new baseball stadium. It doesn't rank up there with Omaha, but for an on-campus non-SEC stadium, it was very nice. The on-site McCarthey Athletic Center is rather small (6,000 capacity) and showing some age from the outside, even though it was renovated 10 years ago.
The campus is located in a university district where WSU and EWU each has a branch campus. Those buildings were much newer and nicer in appearance than what I saw on the Gonzaga campus. But it really doesn't matter what a building looks like from the outside, it is important for what happens within.
What is there to do in Spokane? Well the concert being advertised on local billboards was the Village People and Men at Work. Oh boy. I will say that the Spokane area is very attractive. There are tons of outdoor activities to choose from.
The attraction for a student-athlete to attend Gonzaga has to be the coaching staff. Changes in the coaching staff could have an impact on the sustained success of their athletic programs. [I have no knowledge of what academic programs excel at Gonzaga and am not going to research it.]
Good feedback Hoosier.
It is good to keep in mind that Gonzaga's newish - 10 years old now - basketball facility has a capacity of approximately 6000. As attractive as that school is right now, imagine if it did have a falloff in performance and this conference were left with the logistics involved in having them as a member.
NJRedman, it's not all Xavier fans, it's me with my opinion and me having an exchange with Dude. If you don't want to read these posts, then don't read them. It's a message board. You are not editor-in-chief around here. For better or for worse, the expansion topic will stay alive around here for the foreseeable future. Besides, it's the summertime, so some amount of this kind of dialogue is going to take place here.
Pretty sure I could go back in older threads and find a lot of other X fans bitching about UD. Never said i was the editor in chief and it's my opinion the X bashing of UD is like beating a dead horse. If you don't like that post then don't read it.
AdamTheFlyer wrote:If Fox fails to add the NBA or Big Ten (and both will almost certainly re-sign with ESPN), the Big East may become a 16 team league by 2018. They have to get more games for FS2 and the regionals. Getting the NBA and/or Big Ten would do that by pushing more Big East games to those channels. Without the NBA and/or Big Ten, a near certain reality, there is really only one way to get those games...
marquette wrote:AdamTheFlyer wrote:If Fox fails to add the NBA or Big Ten (and both will almost certainly re-sign with ESPN), the Big East may become a 16 team league by 2018. They have to get more games for FS2 and the regionals. Getting the NBA and/or Big Ten would do that by pushing more Big East games to those channels. Without the NBA and/or Big Ten, a near certain reality, there is really only one way to get those games...
I definitely understand expanding with UD and SLU to get to 12. I can even see eventually going to 14 with VCU and Richmond. However, I think 16 by 2018 is probably too much too soon. UD, SLU, VCU, and UR are all decent to good programs with decent (SLU, UR) to very strong (UD, VCU) fan support. I think attendance and arena size are important to the presidents (see the early idea to add Siena), so VCU and UR might need to try and find a way to add some seats (it is my understanding that VCU is looking to get to 9,000 or so capacity eventually. Not sure on that). The problem with 16 is that there are no viable schools. You could argue Gonzaga, but the logistical issues really make that difficult. Who does that leave in (or near) the footprint without overlap?* My guess is that, if it is determined that 16 is an option, we hold spots 15 and 16 for the next phase of P5 expansion and see what shakes out.**
*Personal opinion, but schools that would probably be eliminated due to overlap are along the lines of Cincy, Temple, St. Joe's, etc.
**All my posts are personal opinion, see signature.
Sincerest apologies to all for furthering my hypocrisy.
BEX wrote:a-10 forum overrun by dayton mods now. Disagree you're banned.
BEX wrote:a-10 forum overrun by dayton mods now. Disagree you're banned.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests