If Wichita St. runs the table, do they deserve a #1 seed?

[Sumdumguy]

I'm corrigible, just playing around. Didn't mean to make you mad.

[SCS]

http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/my_wichita_state_talking_points

Kenpom discusses WSU on his blog.

[senditinjerome]

http://kenpom.com/blog/index.php/weblog/entry/my_wichita_state_talking_points

Kenpom discusses WSU on his blog.

I'll save everyone's time...This whole thing can be summed up in 2 concise sentences:

1) I understand and respect both sides' opinions.
2) I do not have an opinion of my own on this topic, or at least, am not willing to share it.

[Randy]

From the looks of things so far: Yes.

[Dew]

Wichita St is really good. I'm not sure Kentucky is.

[senditinjerome]

welp, I guess that answers that

[SCS]

I feel for WSU players, first loss of the season yet no shot at redempion.

I wish Louisville and UK could both lose next game .

[Randy]

Yeah, tough for me to defend the position they are a number 1 seed now, but I still believe they are. Florida just beat these guys by 1 point. Kentucky looking better than a number 8.

[HoosierPal]

Wow, heck of a game. Wichita State showed they can play with anyone. Early made some serious $$ today. And the crowd was amazing. It sounded about 50/50 between the schools. The Shockers can be proud. They loose Early and Lufile next year, but they will be very good again.

[Gopher+RamFan]

If they had lost to any other 8 seed (Gonzaga, Memphis, Colorado) would people still be saying WSU deserved the 1 seed after a 2-point loss?

Hard to quantify an argument on either side, just an interesting question.