Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:a lot of that is schedule...
Miss St
Vandy
Auburn
Missouri
South Carolina
Iowa
really only 2 decent teams in that mix.
UMass last 7- 4-3 but losses to 3 tourney teams(Dayton, SLU, GW), and win over VCU in the mix.
If UMass couldn't beat tourney teams in their own conference, why should anyone think they can beat a tourney team in the actual tournament? And who did UMass beat in those 4 wins?
URI twice
Duquesne
VCU
Am I supposed to be more impressed with wins over URI and Duquesne than wins over the SEC slugs? The VCU of course is impressive, but that was a month ago before they began their skid, and it was a close game where home court advantage helped. Missouri and Iowa are actually wins over good teams and both came within the past 2 weeks. The Missouri win was a blow out and the Iowa win came on a neutral court in the tournament. I'm much more impressed with those than a 5 point win at home over VCU a month ago.
stever20 wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:stever20 wrote:a lot of that is schedule...
Miss St
Vandy
Auburn
Missouri
South Carolina
Iowa
really only 2 decent teams in that mix.
UMass last 7- 4-3 but losses to 3 tourney teams(Dayton, SLU, GW), and win over VCU in the mix.
If UMass couldn't beat tourney teams in their own conference, why should anyone think they can beat a tourney team in the actual tournament? And who did UMass beat in those 4 wins?
URI twice
Duquesne
VCU
Am I supposed to be more impressed with wins over URI and Duquesne than wins over the SEC slugs? The VCU of course is impressive, but that was a month ago before they began their skid, and it was a close game where home court advantage helped. Missouri and Iowa are actually wins over good teams and both came within the past 2 weeks. The Missouri win was a blow out and the Iowa win came on a neutral court in the tournament. I'm much more impressed with those than a 5 point win at home over VCU a month ago.
True, but I don't know how much stock you can put in Tennessee with some of their wins vs putrid teams.
Think BOTH teams will be jazzed up now, as winner gets Mercer in 2nd rd rather than Duke.
stever20 wrote:just looking though- UMass may normally turn the ball over some, but Tennessee isn't good at forcing the turnovers. 256th in forcing turnovers.
FT not that huge of a difference- 71-68%.
stever20 wrote:stever20 wrote:just looking though- UMass may normally turn the ball over some, but Tennessee isn't good at forcing the turnovers. 256th in forcing turnovers.
FT not that huge of a difference- 71-68%.
about that mulligan....
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 21 guests