hoyahooligan wrote:According to team rankings here is how likely the BE bubble teams are to make the tournament based on their total wins at the end of the year:
Georgetown: 18 wins 32% chance
19 wins 70.5% chance
20 wins 83.4% chance
Xavier: 20 wins: 29.9% chance
21 wins: 74.5% chance
22 wins: 94.1% chance
Providence: 20 wins: 25.2% chance
21 wins: 64.1% chance
22 wins: 86.1% chance
St. Johns: 20 wins: 7.4% chance
21 wins: 34.6% chance
22 wins: 80% chance
XUFan09 wrote:stever20 wrote:XUFan09 wrote:Xavier needs to win a game more than anything so that they can prove they can win without Matt Stainbrook.
While I agree, I think even if he was healthy they still would have needed the win, especially with all the other bubble teams picking up wins.
Most of those bubble teams are going to turn around and lose when they need to win. It's just the way of the world for bubble teams and it happens every year.
hoyahooligan wrote:stever20 wrote:Agree with Georgetown- except I think if we beat Nova, finish 7th, and beat DePaul/Butler, we're in, no matter how we do vs Creighton/Nova in the BET. I just think the tough part is actually beating Nova. Not saying we can't, but they're a darn good team, playing for a #1 seed. They're that for a reason....
Xavier I really don't think they're in if they lose out. Too many teams winning around them- not to mention if a team or two steals a bid.
Are they really playing for a #1 seed? I don't see it. They just don't have enough quality wins imo. Villanova 25-3 RPI 4 SOS 25 Top 50 wins 4 Top 25 wins 1 no bad losses. Just doesn't cut it IMO in terms of quality wins. Heck Wichita St has 3 top 50 wins and 1 top 25 win and people are up in arms about them possibly getting a #1 seed and they're undefeated.
Arizona- 28-2 RPI 1; SOS 6; Top 50 wins 10; Top 25 wins 4; no bad losses
Florida 28-2 RPI 3; SOS 24; Top 50 wins 6; Top 25 wins 2; no bad losses
Kansas 23-7 RPI 2; SOS 1; Top 50 wins 12; Top 25 wins 5; no bad losses
Wisconsin 25-5 RPI 5; SOS 2; Top 50 wins 8; Top 25 wins 5; 1 bad loss( 131 Northwestern)
are all clearly better than Nova's profile IMO.
Michigan 22-7 RPI 10 SOS 5 Top 50 wins 10 top 25 wins 3 1 bad loss(160 Charlotte) is debatably better as well.
Heck I might even prefer Creighton's resume to theirs despite the 3 extra losses when balanced with the 2 poundings they gave Nova.
Creighton 23-6 RPI 7 SOS 15 Top 50 wins 6 Top 25 wins 2 no bad losses
Yes I take Nova over the 3 ACC chumps of Cuse, Duke, and UVA, but I still think they don't really have a shot at jumping to the 1 line. I'd still take Arizona, Florida, Kansas, and Wisonsin over them even if none of them won their conference tournaments and Nova won theirs.
DudeAnon wrote:Honestly, we get 2 or 3 bids max.
Bill Marsh wrote:DudeAnon wrote:Honestly, we get 2 or 3 bids max.
It's not over 'til it's over.
DudeAnon wrote:Bill Marsh wrote:DudeAnon wrote:Honestly, we get 2 or 3 bids max.
It's not over 'til it's over.
True, X is making me pessimistic.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests