dmac80 wrote:Can you provide some insight? I know Lavin had some issues with recruiting or something near the end right? I only know that he had some success with UCLA then suddenly he was gone. Fill us in please.
This was in 2010 when St Johns announced they hired Lavin.
"
Dear St. John's: Enjoy Steve Lavin. Love, UCLA" - Ari Shapiro (ncaa bball blogger)
Steve Lavin is not a good basketball coach. No seriously, he sucks.
So just in case you're still skeptical, just in case you've bought into Lavin's interpretation, let's plan to talk again in five years. Come find me after Lavin has recruited the best talent in the country, still managed to flame out in the Sweet 16, and St. John's is again looking for a new coach. (Eerie right? this guy is a living Nostradamus!)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ari-shapi ... 21280.html-----------------------------------
" Steve Lavin to St. John’s: Well, he won’t be boring" - Tim Kawakami 2010
Summary: A good guy as an assistant; a holy terror (if you ask me and many others, including several of his former players) as head coach; right back into solid good-guy territory as a TV guy.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/kawakami/2 ... be-boring/"As expected ...UCLA's Lavin fired after worst Bruins' season in 55 years" - SI 2003
At times, the Bruins were booed off their home floor, and fans wore T-shirts that said "Lose Lavin" and "Fire Lavin Immediately."http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/basket ... _fired_ap/-----------------------------------------------
"Why We Hate Steve Lavin" - Bruinsnation.com 2011
"As reported by Bay Area blogger Geoff Lepper of the Contra Costa Times, former UCLA point guard Baron Davis looked into the rafters at Pauley Pavilion last Friday during the Golden State Warriors' morning shoot-around and said,
"We should have a banner up there: the only team to make the tournament without a coach."http://www.bruinsnation.com/2011/2/4/19 ... teve-lavin-----------------------------------------------
I could probably dig back to the UCLA message boards back then but its basically like reading Redmen.com right now.
Going off my memory (I grew up in California), when Harrick got fired from UCLA, there were 3 viable candidates who happened to be assistants under Harrick at the time; Steve Lavin, Lorenzo Romar, and Mark Gottfried. Romar ended up being a HC at Washington and Mark Gottfried is currently the HC at NC State. Neither seemed like the "unpolished diamond" Lavin seemed to be.
To be honest, there was a lot of excitement built up and Lavin seemed poised to be the potential coach. He was young, flashy, great with the media, and could out-recruit anyone in the country, he seemed like the perfect fit for Hollywood (UCLA). He inherited a great squad his first year (ditto @ St. Johns) and also recruited with the best of them. I think one year he had the best recruiting class in the country. Fast forward a few years and people started noticing the same issues he has at St. Johns right now. Great talent but unable to win, lack of player development, horrible in-game-coaching, and players quickly losing respect for him (cant confirm this at St. Johns). Critics, including Lavin, always made the excuse that UCLA expected too much from him and rightfully so, but when you factor in all the hype and talent around Lavin, they should have never finish in the bottom half of the Pac-10 and which they did. I've said it before, Lavin is best suited as an Asst Coach that can convince top talent to sign, leave the coaching part to someone who knows what they're doing.