big picture view of Big East teams

The home for Big East hoops

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby stever20 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:12 pm

aughnanure wrote:Of course Creighton will "compete." Does that mean they're going to be a top 2-3 team and compete to win the Big East every year? Probably not. I see them making the tourney more years than not, finishing in the 4-6 range most of the time, with a top 3 finish and a bottom 4 finish (they'll be a down year every now and again) sprinkled throughout.

My main concern with Creighton is Big McDermott. He was pretty terrible at Iowa St, and its not like the Big XII was world beaters then (outside KU of course). The question will be, does his style and recruiting fit better in a mid-tier conference a la MVC, or was Iowa St just an aberration? Cause I think this league will be much much closer to the Big XII than it will ever be to MVC where he enjoyed great success being a big fish in a smaller pond.


Big 12 always very underrated. In the 4 years McDermott coached there- Big 12 in Ken Pom was ranked 6,1,2,1. Last 3 years they got 6,6,7 teams in the tournament. So it was pretty close to world beaters.
stever20
 
Posts: 13487
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby TrueBlueJay » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:42 pm

aughnanure wrote:Of course Creighton will "compete." Does that mean they're going to be a top 2-3 team and compete to win the Big East every year? Probably not. I see them making the tourney more years than not, finishing in the 4-6 range most of the time, with a top 3 finish and a bottom 4 finish (they'll be a down year every now and again) sprinkled throughout.

My main concern with Creighton is Big McDermott. He was pretty terrible at Iowa St, and its not like the Big XII was world beaters then (outside KU of course). The question will be, does his style and recruiting fit better in a mid-tier conference a la MVC, or was Iowa St just an aberration? Cause I think this league will be much much closer to the Big XII than it will ever be to MVC where he enjoyed great success being a big fish in a smaller pond.


A fair question that has been raised before. Only time will tell. I think Coach Mac is on the path to do things right at CU and to have a winning program. He readily admits he didn't run the program at ISU like he should have and that he won't compromise on that going forward...hopefully a lesson learned and he'll have many successful seasons with Creighton in the BE.
User avatar
TrueBlueJay
 
Posts: 178
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2013 10:02 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby whiteandblue77 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:51 pm

aughnanure wrote: He was pretty terrible at Iowa St, and its not like the Big XII was world beaters then (outside KU of course).


Texas with Kevin Durant is "outside KU of course"? :roll: The ISU arguments against McDermott are kinda shortsighted in the big picture (which is supposed to be what this thread is about, right?). TONS of great coaches had speedbumps along the way, and were in situations that weren't a good fit. Dana Altman had a bad experience at KSU, where he HATED being in Bill Snyder's shadow and the administration that expected too much right away... he pretty much got run out of there before he came to Creighton, where he was our winningest coach. Doing quite well on the big stage at Oregon. I'm imagining they do things in Eugene a little different than in Ames Iowa or Manhattan Kansas.
The Big East is Dead! Long Live the Big East!
User avatar
whiteandblue77
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby aughnanure » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:53 pm

stever20 wrote:
aughnanure wrote:Of course Creighton will "compete." Does that mean they're going to be a top 2-3 team and compete to win the Big East every year? Probably not. I see them making the tourney more years than not, finishing in the 4-6 range most of the time, with a top 3 finish and a bottom 4 finish (they'll be a down year every now and again) sprinkled throughout.

My main concern with Creighton is Big McDermott. He was pretty terrible at Iowa St, and its not like the Big XII was world beaters then (outside KU of course). The question will be, does his style and recruiting fit better in a mid-tier conference a la MVC, or was Iowa St just an aberration? Cause I think this league will be much much closer to the Big XII than it will ever be to MVC where he enjoyed great success being a big fish in a smaller pond.


Big 12 always very underrated. In the 4 years McDermott coached there- Big 12 in Ken Pom was ranked 6,1,2,1. Last 3 years they got 6,6,7 teams in the tournament. So it was pretty close to world beaters.


Meant that as more none of them were powerhouses outside KU. Wait, Texas was actually still rolling then, so yeah those two. Fair enough. But after that it really was a lot of depth. And he couldn't win there, and it wasn't pretty. That's what worries me, cause it won't be as easy to pull out of 3-4 year down cycle as it was in the MVC. And this goes for everyone for that matter. Have a couple bad years, make a bad new hire, give him 3-4 bad years before firing, etc...its really easy to go through a 6-10 year down period in good leagues.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes to make it possible”
User avatar
aughnanure
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:54 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby aughnanure » Fri Jan 10, 2014 12:58 pm

whiteandblue77 wrote:
aughnanure wrote: He was pretty terrible at Iowa St, and its not like the Big XII was world beaters then (outside KU of course).


Texas with Kevin Durant is "outside KU of course"? :roll: The ISU arguments against McDermott are kinda shortsighted in the big picture (which is supposed to be what this thread is about, right?). TONS of great coaches had speedbumps along the way, and were in situations that weren't a good fit. Dana Altman had a bad experience at KSU, where he HATED being in Bill Snyder's shadow and the administration that expected too much right away... he pretty much got run out of there before he came to Creighton, where he was our winningest coach. Doing quite well on the big stage at Oregon. I'm imagining they do things in Eugene a little different than in Ames Iowa or Manhattan Kansas.


Well when no one actually beats KU, I have a hard time calling another program a powerhouse. But you're right, that's when Texas was rolling as a program and looked every bit like a Florida, Ohio St level (up till 2009 ish though). I like Dana. Grew up as a KSU fan. But no one wanted him to leave. Hell he beat KU twice in his last year! If Altman were still there, I like Creighton much more. Just concerned.

FUN FACT: Texas didn't even make it to the Sweet 16 with Kevin Durant. I'll let that sink in for a moment.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes to make it possible”
User avatar
aughnanure
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:54 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby whiteandblue77 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:05 pm

aughnanure wrote:
whiteandblue77 wrote:
aughnanure wrote: He was pretty terrible at Iowa St, and its not like the Big XII was world beaters then (outside KU of course).


Texas with Kevin Durant is "outside KU of course"? :roll: The ISU arguments against McDermott are kinda shortsighted in the big picture (which is supposed to be what this thread is about, right?). TONS of great coaches had speedbumps along the way, and were in situations that weren't a good fit. Dana Altman had a bad experience at KSU, where he HATED being in Bill Snyder's shadow and the administration that expected too much right away... he pretty much got run out of there before he came to Creighton, where he was our winningest coach. Doing quite well on the big stage at Oregon. I'm imagining they do things in Eugene a little different than in Ames Iowa or Manhattan Kansas.


Well when no one actually beats KU, I have a hard time calling another program a powerhouse. But you're right, that's when Texas was rolling as a program and looked every bit like a Florida, Ohio St level (up till 2009 ish though). I like Dana. Grew up as a KSU fan. But no one wanted him to leave. Hell he beat KU twice in his last year! If Altman were still there, I like Creighton much more. Just concerned.

FUN FACT: Texas didn't even make it to the Sweet 16 with Kevin Durant. I'll let that sink in for a moment.


Well, to be honest, I wasn't thrilled myself with the Coach Mac hire, at the time I wanted Kevin McKenna real bad. But since he's been at CU I'm 150% convinced Big Mac was the right hire. It's why our AD Bruce Rasmussen is one of the smartest around (and he's been around for a long ass time). Greg is the PERFECT coach for Creighton and Omaha and the Big East.

But as TrueBlue pointed out, this is ALL speculation at this point in time.

What we REALLY need to be worried about is the BCS conferences and all the Division 4 talk (sorry to bring up the white elephant but that's what I do). :D
The Big East is Dead! Long Live the Big East!
User avatar
whiteandblue77
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby aughnanure » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:08 pm

whiteandblue77 wrote:
aughnanure wrote:
whiteandblue77 wrote:
Texas with Kevin Durant is "outside KU of course"? :roll: The ISU arguments against McDermott are kinda shortsighted in the big picture (which is supposed to be what this thread is about, right?). TONS of great coaches had speedbumps along the way, and were in situations that weren't a good fit. Dana Altman had a bad experience at KSU, where he HATED being in Bill Snyder's shadow and the administration that expected too much right away... he pretty much got run out of there before he came to Creighton, where he was our winningest coach. Doing quite well on the big stage at Oregon. I'm imagining they do things in Eugene a little different than in Ames Iowa or Manhattan Kansas.


Well when no one actually beats KU, I have a hard time calling another program a powerhouse. But you're right, that's when Texas was rolling as a program and looked every bit like a Florida, Ohio St level (up till 2009 ish though). I like Dana. Grew up as a KSU fan. But no one wanted him to leave. Hell he beat KU twice in his last year! If Altman were still there, I like Creighton much more. Just concerned.

FUN FACT: Texas didn't even make it to the Sweet 16 with Kevin Durant. I'll let that sink in for a moment.


Well, to be honest, I wasn't thrilled myself with the Coach Mac hire, at the time I wanted Kevin McKenna real bad. But since he's been at CU I'm 150% convinced Big Mac was the right hire. It's why our AD Bruce Rasmussen is one of the smartest around (and he's been around for a long ass time). Greg is the PERFECT coach for Creighton and Omaha and the Big East.

But as TrueBlue pointed out, this is ALL speculation at this point in time.

What we REALLY need to be worried about is the BCS conferences and all the Division 4 talk (sorry to bring up the white elephant but that's what I do). :D


Not worried at all about that. They WILL NOT murder the NCAA tournament. They know if they do, they will never, ever, ever get it back.
“All men dream; but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act out their dreams with open eyes to make it possible”
User avatar
aughnanure
 
Posts: 570
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:54 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby pki1998 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:27 pm

A message to Creighton fans....

1) Haters are going to hate.
2) Scoreboard

Listen people are always going to give reasons why someone on a roll will fail. You guys are 3-0 in confernce! Just concentrate on winning not on arguing against the haters. If you keep winning they will be proven wrong.

That being said I a nervously awaiting our game. It will be a big challenge for Xavier. X has been playing well as of late, but only have played one true road game. And Lets face it Alabama is not on the same level, so this should be the biggest challenge X has faced this year. Unfortunately I think X will probably lose but it still should be a good hard fought game. Lets hope the refs let them play more than they did in the X-Marquette game
Xavier
User avatar
pki1998
 
Posts: 319
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 8:49 pm

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby billyjack » Fri Jan 10, 2014 3:12 pm

I like that none of the 10 BE coaches act like a-holes on the sidelines. I can't stand to watch McCaffery, Crean and Motta. Buzz roams the sideline but he doesn't act like a jackass.
Providence
User avatar
billyjack
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4168
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:59 pm
Location: Providence

Re: big picture view of Big East teams

Postby ChelseaFriar » Fri Jan 10, 2014 6:55 pm

billyjack wrote:I like that none of the 10 BE coaches act like a-holes on the sidelines. I can't stand to watch McCaffery, Crean and Motta. Buzz roams the sideline but he doesn't act like a jackass.


Buzz seems to be a likeable guy. Good interview and a ton of passion.

How about Hurley at URI on the sidelines? Oh, wait, I mean how about Hurley standing on the free throw line the entire game in a defensive stance when his team is pressing?
User avatar
ChelseaFriar
 
Posts: 747
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 9:19 am

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 41 guests