Friarfan2 wrote:The problem with the AAC is that half that league is complete trash. They don't have any institutional support for basketball nor any fan base. Same problem that old c-usa had.
Top of the league will be fine. But the overall conference rpi is always going to lag behind the major conferences. They won't be getting a higher percentage of bids than other conferences. And their tv deal is atrocious.
What we have going is a great thing. Should almost always be top 6 rpi, should avrage about 40-45% of our leage with bids (usually 4 bids, sometimes 5 bids, occassionally 3 bids), and should usually have 70-80% of our team in the top 100oh yeah, and our tv deal is freaking amazing!!
Anyone jealous of the AAC is not looking at the big picture.
stever20 wrote:There's questions about us next year. How does Creighton rebuild? St John's and Providence won't get the same respect preseason they got this year. Butler hasn't beaten anyone good- and is likely looking NIT.
Also, the tourney this year will be huge. RIght now we are looking at somethign like 3/7/8/8. If we got a 2nd team in the 2nd weekend- it'd be a major upset. And folks view the tourney big time now. For a lot of people- it is the season.
stever20 wrote:Also what RPI's are you using? Those aren't the current RPI's, and they aren't the projected RPI's.
stever20 wrote:There's questions about us next year. How does Creighton rebuild? St John's and Providence won't get the same respect preseason they got this year. Butler hasn't beaten anyone good- and is likely looking NIT.
Also, the tourney this year will be huge. RIght now we are looking at somethign like 3/7/8/8. If we got a 2nd team in the 2nd weekend- it'd be a major upset. And folks view the tourney big time now. For a lot of people- it is the season.
notkirkcameron wrote:stever20 wrote:Also what RPI's are you using? Those aren't the current RPI's, and they aren't the projected RPI's.
The ones listed on ESPN.com. They are updated pretty frequently.
Friarfan2 wrote:Exactly. Who care about being the #1 conference? We just need to remain among the top conferences.
Would you rather be rutgers out of the big east, virginia tech out of the acc, or a better team from a lesser conference this past decade like kansas out of big 12 or arizona out of the pac 10?
And it wasn't that long ago that the big 10 was deemed a struggling conference. (5 yrs ago?). Obviously they turned it around.
Just keep our conference rpi consistently in the top 5 (and sometimes better), keep sending 40-45% of our teams to the dance, keep up our major market presence, keep winning tourney games, and we will be fine.
And the best thing we ever did was split away from the american conference teams. Way too much slop at the bottom to keep up our mission. Uconn will be fine. Memphis will be fine. Cincy will make the tournament in a good number of years. Remains to be seen how tough shape temple is in. I am sure they will have a team ocassional jump up to tourney quality (like usf did out of the big east a couple of years ago). But overall that conference has a lot of flaws. They have horrible media financial support and an equally as bad media exposure deal (unless you like espn news and internet streamed games), and the bottom of that conference is never really going to pull themselves out of the basement with them chasing football glory with all their resources.
American conference isn't the worst conference, just like old c-usa wasn't the worst. But it is a very good thing we split, and anyone looking objectively will agree. (Cue stever claiming that I am comparing the american to the southwest or the neac, even though I acknowledge that their top teams will still compete)
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests