Bluejay wrote:TheHall wrote:stever20 wrote:It will be hard for us to get 6 teams in. And actually- if we did get 6 in, we'd have to have it where the #1 seed is like 12-6 or something like that, and 6th team is 9-9(I don't see us at all getting a sub .500 team in). Well- if that happens- our top team may be like a 5 or 6 seed, and then have a bunch of 8-12 seeds. What does that do? 2nd round games against 1-2 seeds. I'd rather get 4 teams in but have them all seeded stronger than have 6 teams in but seeded poorly.
So you're saying you wouldn't mind if your team was one of the two that didn't make it. A conference should always want to get as many bids as possible. Seeding is irrelevant once the tourny begins and 6 bids>4 bids.
Man, I want to agree with you, but as a fan of a team that has received back to back 8 and then 7 seeds, seeding absolutely matters. Having to play the one seed or two seed in your second game substantially reduces the chances of a team going on a nice run. Getting an 8 seed is like taking a punch to the crotch.
I guess the real question is, what makes the conference look better - more teams getting into the dance or more teams making it to the second weekend? I'd say the latter, especially when we are trying to build up some NCAA tourney credits ($$$$$) for distribution in the future.
admin wrote:Getting ready to submit my rankings for next week - feel free to share your input or make a case for your team.
Bill Marsh wrote:For another perspective, here's how TeamRankings.com has it, based strictly on what teams have done so far this season:
1. Xavier
2. Creighton
3. Providence
4. Butler
5. St. John's
6. Villanova
7. Georgetown
8. Seton Hall
9. Marquette
10. DePaul
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 41 guests