Big East vs. Power Leagues Discussion

The home for Big East hoops

Re: BIG EAST vs. OTHER POWER LEAGUES - HOOPS

Postby Bluejay » Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:48 am

redmen9194 wrote:Getting back to the original purpose of this thread, the X represents against Tennessee with Raft in the house.

vs. ACC: 1-0
vs. SEC: 1-0
vs. Big Ten: 0-1
vs. PAC-12: 0-1
vs. Big XII: 0-0
vs. AAC: 0-0

Overall: 2-2


Honestly, you should start a whole new thread for this topic as I think it is important and a great topic throughout the noncon. Unfortunately, this thread has turned into a big mess and the update posts are getting lost.
User avatar
Bluejay
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:34 pm

Re: BIG EAST vs. OTHER POWER LEAGUES - HOOPS

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: BIG EAST vs. OTHER POWER LEAGUES - HOOPS

Postby redmen9194 » Wed Nov 13, 2013 12:11 pm

Bluejay wrote:
redmen9194 wrote:Getting back to the original purpose of this thread, the X represents against Tennessee with Raft in the house.

vs. ACC: 1-0
vs. SEC: 1-0
vs. Big Ten: 0-1
vs. PAC-12: 0-1
vs. Big XII: 0-0
vs. AAC: 0-0

Overall: 2-2


Honestly, you should start a whole new thread for this topic as I think it is important and a great topic throughout the noncon. Unfortunately, this thread has turned into a big mess and the update posts are getting lost.


Not a bad idea Bluejay. Done.
User avatar
redmen9194
 
Posts: 1425
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:46 am

Re: Big East vs. Power Leagues Discussion

Postby MUBoxer » Wed Nov 13, 2013 12:57 pm

billyjack wrote:My initial point on Page 13 wasn't saying that the Duke-UNC-Syracuse-Louisville foursome isn't amazing... I didn't even go there. I just mentioned how I thought the other 10 ACC schools were overrated and have accomplished basically squat in recent years-- all while getting the benefit of the doubt in polls and all. I mean, after a few days, against my better judgment, I started to actually think BC was something special and was worthy of some Top-25 votes... instead, they've become the latest team to benefit from the overhyped lower tier of the ACC. In the coming weeks, look for Virginia Tech to get some un-deserved Top 25 votes.


Like say GTech's final four, Maryland's championship, Florida State and Miami in the sweet 16, Pitt's elite 8s and sweet 16s. Yeah the other 11 teams are clearly awful. And remember that until we prove otherwise we can't critique them seeing as really only MU, GT, Nova, X and Butler have done anything recently.
Marquette 2013
NUI-Galway 2019
MUBoxer
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:48 pm

Re: Big East vs. Power Leagues Discussion

Postby stever20 » Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:03 pm

MUBoxer wrote:
billyjack wrote:My initial point on Page 13 wasn't saying that the Duke-UNC-Syracuse-Louisville foursome isn't amazing... I didn't even go there. I just mentioned how I thought the other 10 ACC schools were overrated and have accomplished basically squat in recent years-- all while getting the benefit of the doubt in polls and all. I mean, after a few days, against my better judgment, I started to actually think BC was something special and was worthy of some Top-25 votes... instead, they've become the latest team to benefit from the overhyped lower tier of the ACC. In the coming weeks, look for Virginia Tech to get some un-deserved Top 25 votes.


Like say GTech's final four, Maryland's championship, Florida State and Miami in the sweet 16, Pitt's elite 8s and sweet 16s, ND's consistency. Yeah the other 11 teams are clearly awful.

Maryland you have to take out of consideration when Louisville arrives.

ACC is a solid conference, no two ways about it. It's not the best ever, and I don't know if i'd say it's the best this year even.

I think where the ACC is different than the old Big East- while we had the same mid tier teams consistently- they have Florida St 1 year, Miami 1 year, NC State 1 year, etc.
stever20
 
Posts: 13487
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: Big East vs. Power Leagues Discussion

Postby Bill Marsh » Wed Nov 13, 2013 1:16 pm

stever20 wrote:
MUBoxer wrote:Like say GTech's final four, Maryland's championship, Florida State and Miami in the sweet 16, Pitt's elite 8s and sweet 16s, ND's consistency. Yeah the other 11 teams are clearly awful.

Maryland you have to take out of consideration when Louisville arrives.

ACC is a solid conference, no two ways about it. It's not the best ever, and I don't know if i'd say it's the best this year even.

I think where the ACC is different than the old Big East- while we had the same mid tier teams consistently- they have Florida St 1 year, Miami 1 year, NC State 1 year, etc.


Steve, I think you've nailed it. While clearly NC and Duke are in the mix almost every year, there always seems to be someone else from the ACC that has it's moment in the sun and then gives way to someone else. Final Fours alone, there's someone every decade besides the big two - Georgia Tech in the past decade, Maryland before them, Georgia Tech again back in 1990, Virginia and NC State back in the '80's, NC State in the '70's, Wake in the '60's. And if we want to look at Elite 8's and Sweet 16's, we'd come up with plenty more. As you say, the difference from the Big East is that it's a revolving list of schools that step up.
Bill Marsh
 
Posts: 4239
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 10:43 am

Previous

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 39 guests