Omaha1 wrote:Any addition to the Big East needs to make us better. Gonzaga does that. Dayton does not.
Moving on.
Husky_U wrote:Providence soooooooooooooooooooo nasty towards Gonzaga! Boooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
dakphonics wrote:Dayton made the Elite 8 in 2014, and has made 3 other NCAA tournaments, and robbed of further glory when Toppin was smashing rims, and then the NCAA tournament was cancelled. If Dayton would have done that in the Big East the last 8 seasons they would have way more than carried their weight and added NCAA credits to our pile. They’ve done more since realignment than half of our conference. I again fail to understand why anyone would say they don’t improve the conference. And again I’m not a Dayton guy. I’m a diehard Bluejay.
XUFan09 wrote:Hall2012 wrote:dakphonics wrote:Dayton made the Elite 8 in 2014, and has made 3 other NCAA tournaments, and robbed of further glory when Toppin was smashing rims, and then the NCAA tournament was cancelled. If Dayton would have done that in the Big East the last 8 seasons they would have way more than carried their weight and added NCAA credits to our pile. They’ve done more since realignment than half of our conference. I again fail to understand why anyone would say they don’t improve the conference. And again I’m not a Dayton guy. I’m a diehard Bluejay.
I don’t understand the love for SLU outside of geography. It’s a bigger city but basketball is not a concern to the people there, and they have almost no history in the sport. I want teams with a good product and rabid fans.
It's a major sports down with a DMA nearly 3x the size of Dayton. Local TV viewership for both the Blues and Cards are elite for their respective leagues. They were drawing nearly 30k for the freaking XFL. Incoming MLS team sold out instantly, obviously no TV data available for them yet. With no NBA team, I see a potentially very high ceiling for high major college basketball.
Decent number of Mizzou fans in St. Louis, but that's probably partly a function of SLU not being in a high major conference.
kayako wrote:Husky_U wrote:Providence soooooooooooooooooooo nasty towards Gonzaga! Boooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
Maybe they really do have inside info, but that episode was full of uhh eager assumptions
-BE will stay at 18 conference games with Gonzaga. They weren't aware that we're already at 20.
-Jay Wright is great friends with Mark Few, but would attempt to block their entry out of pettiness (apparently Nova doesn't like sharing the spotlight). I am not sure if they are aware of UCONN's move back to the BE.
-FOX is harming the Big East and Val is trying to get us away.
-The move won't happen until 2024/2025 because of our existing contract with Fox. Again, it's like UCONN didn't happen. They weren't aware of the clause that allows expansion to 12 teams without taking a paycut.
-Geography doesn't matter because it's not 1983.
-They're trying to bring only basketball to the Big East. AFAIK there is no loophole for Gonzaga to be able to do this. Basketball means all sports sponsored by that conference. This is why there is no basketball independents.
-Big East teams would help Gonzaga negotiate with the WCC (letting olympic sports stay) by agreeing to some kind of conference challenge going forward. They mentioned a hypothetical top 5 WCC vs. top 5 BE. I've said this many times, but a scheduling agreement with WCC is highly unlikely, with or without Gonzaga. Jay Wright, Dan Hurley, etc., aren't signing up for road games at Saint Mary's, Santa Clara, etc.
-Big East would cover Gonzaga's exit fees.
TheZagaholic wrote:kayako wrote:Husky_U wrote:Providence soooooooooooooooooooo nasty towards Gonzaga! Boooooooooooooooooooooo!!!
Maybe they really do have inside info, but that episode was full of uhh eager assumptions
-BE will stay at 18 conference games with Gonzaga. They weren't aware that we're already at 20.
-Jay Wright is great friends with Mark Few, but would attempt to block their entry out of pettiness (apparently Nova doesn't like sharing the spotlight). I am not sure if they are aware of UCONN's move back to the BE.
-FOX is harming the Big East and Val is trying to get us away.
-The move won't happen until 2024/2025 because of our existing contract with Fox. Again, it's like UCONN didn't happen. They weren't aware of the clause that allows expansion to 12 teams without taking a paycut.
-Geography doesn't matter because it's not 1983.
-They're trying to bring only basketball to the Big East. AFAIK there is no loophole for Gonzaga to be able to do this. Basketball means all sports sponsored by that conference. This is why there is no basketball independents.
-Big East teams would help Gonzaga negotiate with the WCC (letting olympic sports stay) by agreeing to some kind of conference challenge going forward. They mentioned a hypothetical top 5 WCC vs. top 5 BE. I've said this many times, but a scheduling agreement with WCC is highly unlikely, with or without Gonzaga. Jay Wright, Dan Hurley, etc., aren't signing up for road games at Saint Mary's, Santa Clara, etc.
-Big East would cover Gonzaga's exit fees.
I misspoke on the conference schedule. Not always easy to be perfect when recording 1.5 of material. Of course we know UConn is in the league, lol. There were definitely hypotheticals thrown because people want to talk about it and have points of interest to discuss. The WCC scheduling thing was a hypothetical and yes it’s probably unlikely. The Olympic sports can be in another conference, you just need NCAA and conference approval to make it happen. Which would be likely in this case to avoid undue hardship on non revenue sports. The fox/BE bit was actually something i was told by a big east insider, lol. There are definitely rumblings about the fox deal. The move will definitely be affected by the tv deal and also a final agreement on where the olympic sports reside. I think you misinterpreted the part where we talked Jay Wright/Mark Few, we were actually agreeing it would be unlikely Nova would block GU out or pettiness because of that fact. I spent like 2 minutes saying how geography isnt the issue some make it out to be, so again we agree.
Xudash wrote:Chap - I would think that that is the primary way to look at it. It is all about taking actions that strengthen the conference. A more lucrative media agreement will certainly help with that.
I imagine most of us believe that the media agreement was going to improve even without the addition of UConn, but it will now most certainly improve with UConn being part of the conference. That becomes the evaluative bar, right? The payout per school is going to be north of $4 million most likely. Which schools are capable of helping to increase that new higher figure, or at the very least, provide value to the conference without reducing the new per member payout? I imagine that is a very small list. I also imagine that list includes schools that are essentially perceived to be very unavailable (e.g. Notre Dame).
The only other clear potential driver of expansion appears to be about conference size. Can we remain at 11 and be well positioned with respect to 00C conference challenges and available content, etc.? I do not have a feel for that one. Nonetheless, expanding to get bigger for some reason while reversing down the payout per school probably will be a debated and tenuous decision.
Every year is interesting, but the next couple of years will be very interesting for the Big East as we close in on a new media agreement.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests