DeadHeadHoya wrote:I wonder if Syracuse , pitt and MD come crawling back . BC? Lol
stever20 wrote:kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:Villanova is in full "boat race" mode in every regard with respect to the Big 5 (albeit PENN is its own unique academic beast). At the very least, Nova "owns" St. Joe's, LossSalle and Temple, yet it cannot possibly have any institutional desire to open the door for any one of those three to the BE, even if Philly is a big enough town to warrant two members.
When Temple was good, they would've been an afterthought in the BE. The current BE can probably use early John Chaney era Temple program, but I'm afraid they'll never get back to that level. I'm a big believer in synergy created by local relevant rivalries. Sometimes it's better to share than have the pie all to yourself. Local recruits aren't as important as it used to be.
what is strange about Temple is they actually had a good guy replacing the legend(which is so unusual). I think the next hire for Temple is going to be an absolute critical one for them.
kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:Villanova is in full "boat race" mode in every regard with respect to the Big 5 (albeit PENN is its own unique academic beast). At the very least, Nova "owns" St. Joe's, LossSalle and Temple, yet it cannot possibly have any institutional desire to open the door for any one of those three to the BE, even if Philly is a big enough town to warrant two members.
When Temple was good, they would've been an afterthought in the BE. The current BE can probably use early John Chaney era Temple program, but I'm afraid they'll never get back to that level. I'm a big believer in synergy created by local relevant rivalries. Sometimes it's better to share than have the pie all to yourself. Local recruits aren't as important as it used to be.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:kayako wrote:Xudash wrote:Villanova is in full "boat race" mode in every regard with respect to the Big 5 (albeit PENN is its own unique academic beast). At the very least, Nova "owns" St. Joe's, LossSalle and Temple, yet it cannot possibly have any institutional desire to open the door for any one of those three to the BE, even if Philly is a big enough town to warrant two members.
When Temple was good, they would've been an afterthought in the BE. The current BE can probably use early John Chaney era Temple program, but I'm afraid they'll never get back to that level. I'm a big believer in synergy created by local relevant rivalries. Sometimes it's better to share than have the pie all to yourself. Local recruits aren't as important as it used to be.
Temple might be the best example of a BB program imploding b/c of football decisions and realignment. They are now where UConn was 3 years ago. Football not good enough to be attractive to bigger/better conferences; BB stuck with schools that have zero regional connection and are not committed to BB excellence; terrible media deal.
Tulane? East Carolina? Now look at who they are adding. In 2 years when the top schools land in the B12 it is going to be a horrible BB conference. I also haven't seen them on TV in forever. They are not recruiting well (big surprise) and their new coach is struggling and under a ton of scrutiny. I'm a fan of college hoops history and rivalries, but the Big 5 games have become yearly beat downs. I grew up on the Big 5; it WAS big. Now, it's become a sad, sad shell of what it used to be.
Lastly geographies should be respected IMO. No Dayton. No Loyola Chicago. No Fordham or St. Bonnies or St. Joe's or URI or GWU. We need new markets. St. Louis may be the only candidate that makes geographic sense but they are not a good enough program at this point. Just sit pat and wait to see what happens is the best strategy at this point.
stever20 wrote:Lastly geographies should be respected IMO. No Dayton. No Loyola Chicago. No Fordham or St. Bonnies or St. Joe's or URI or GWU. We need new markets. St. Louis may be the only candidate that makes geographic sense but they are not a good enough program at this point. Just sit pat and wait to see what happens is the best strategy at this point.
Hall2012 wrote:kayako wrote:Hall2012 wrote:If they insist on expanding, I think the best bet would just be to pick the major city / media market you want to get into, invite the biggest private d1 school in it (with a commitment to increasing its basketball investment to an agreed upon level), and trust that the power of the Big East brand along with the increased investment will raise its profile.
Why limit yourself to private? This must be the assumption Dayton fans make and delude themselves into thinking they're the best natural fit for the BE.
You don't necessarily have to, but the league seems to care about being private as part of "institutional fit" and was only willing to make an exception for UConn. If a public school stood out as a clearly superior add then go for it, but I don't see one.
stever20 wrote:
I think Temple is honestly lower than where UConn was a few years ago. And they seemingly don't have a get out of jail free card to get rid of their coach the way UConn did.
I don't know that there is anything Temple could have done quite honestly. If they had remained in the A10, they would have been even more of a money disadvantage- the AAC does pay a lot more money than the A10 does(like 7 or 8 times as much).
MUBoxer wrote:stever20 wrote:Lastly geographies should be respected IMO. No Dayton. No Loyola Chicago. No Fordham or St. Bonnies or St. Joe's or URI or GWU. We need new markets. St. Louis may be the only candidate that makes geographic sense but they are not a good enough program at this point. Just sit pat and wait to see what happens is the best strategy at this point.
If we're waiting for new market programs to develop id say Detroit or Nashville would be more attractive than waiting on St Louis to develop. Id 100% do a road trip up to Detroit mercy or to Belmont. Instead of a trip down to the crumbling city of St Louis (side project brewery not included)
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests