Xudash wrote:Letsgonova wrote:I was and am 100% for adding UCONN to the league. Nothing but positives from a competition standpoint.
But their fans. Oh, their fans. I would suggest all of the fans who didn't previously experience a BET with UCONN to withhold their judgement until they see one firsthand. 10,000 drunk middle-aged white guys with long-sleeve t-shirts tucked securely into their carpenter jeans, New Balance 409s squeaking on the polished concrete of MSG, secure in their knowledge that college basketball started around 1992 and Jim Calhoun is basically Jesus Christ with better man-to-man concepts and more capacity for forgiving (his players') sins.
Well, that paints a picture!
Xudash wrote:I didn’t want the BE to stand pat as a Xavier fan.
I was always 100% for adding UCONN and stopping at 11 to maintain the RR (my presumption is that we are safe on the content quantity issue; if that ever changes and the media agreement demands additional content from us, then OK, we add a 12th member).
Always seemed to be an obvious move - for TV, for MSG, optics for the composition of the conference, etc.
I’m looking forward to watching some of the old rivalries, while providing UCONN a better Cincy rivalry.
Letsgonova wrote:I was and am 100% for adding UCONN to the league. Nothing but positives from a competition standpoint.
But their fans. Oh, their fans. I would suggest all of the fans who didn't previously experience a BET with UCONN to withhold their judgement until they see one firsthand. 10,000 drunk middle-aged white guys with long-sleeve t-shirts tucked securely into their carpenter jeans, New Balance 409s squeaking on the polished concrete of MSG, secure in their knowledge that college basketball started around 1992 and Jim Calhoun is basically Jesus Christ with better man-to-man concepts and more capacity for forgiving (his players') sins.
Xudash wrote:Letsgonova wrote:I was and am 100% for adding UCONN to the league. Nothing but positives from a competition standpoint.
But their fans. Oh, their fans. I would suggest all of the fans who didn't previously experience a BET with UCONN to withhold their judgement until they see one firsthand. 10,000 drunk middle-aged white guys with long-sleeve t-shirts tucked securely into their carpenter jeans, New Balance 409s squeaking on the polished concrete of MSG, secure in their knowledge that college basketball started around 1992 and Jim Calhoun is basically Jesus Christ with better man-to-man concepts and more capacity for forgiving (his players') sins.
Well, that paints a picture!
thunderbird wrote:Xudash wrote:I didn’t want the BE to stand pat as a Xavier fan.
I was always 100% for adding UCONN and stopping at 11 to maintain the RR (my presumption is that we are safe on the content quantity issue; if that ever changes and the media agreement demands additional content from us, then OK, we add a 12th member).
Always seemed to be an obvious move - for TV, for MSG, optics for the composition of the conference, etc.
I’m looking forward to watching some of the old rivalries, while providing UCONN a better Cincy rivalry.
I agree on the content quantity. Fox College Hoops now has us and B1G in the eastern/central time zones and Pac-12 and MW in the mountain/pacific time zones. Some might not realize, but the addition of UConn didn't necessarily increase our package quantity by much. The 2 OOC games that UConn replaces for each school most likely would've been buy home games, so those 20 games gets reduced to 10 games in quantity. UConn's 10 home conference games negates that reduction of OOC games, so only their OOC schedule is an increase in quantity. Out of those 11 games, you subtract however many for a MTE, challenge, h/h, etc. and you're hovering around an increase of 7 games in quantity. However, as for content quality, that increases exponentially. And that's what they're ultimately paying for. On top of that, they obtain broadcasting rights to the most decorated program in women's college basketball. Again, the quality is what's valuable. Now, if we were to expand to 12 and maintain the 20 conference game schedule, that'd be an increase of ~17 games in quantity. If Fox College Hoops truly wanted that much additional content from us then they simply wouldn't sublicense the 20 games to CBS and CBS Sports Network they currently do or even the few games aired on Fox Sports Regional Networks. That's why I don't see them demanding us to expand simply for additional content. If it's just filler they need, then there are much cheaper avenues than us expanding. Now, if they wanted us to expand with a quality program (e.g. Gonzaga) or national brand (e.g. Notre Dame) or, hell, into an untapped TV market for them so they could sell more subscriptions to FS1 (e.g. Saint Louis), then maybe. But as it stands right now, the addition of UConn is a net positive for all parties involved—BE, UConn, and Fox Sports—and I don't expect the composition of the conference to change any time soon.
gtmoBlue wrote:Xudash wrote:Letsgonova wrote:I was and am 100% for adding UCONN to the league. Nothing but positives from a competition standpoint.
But their fans. Oh, their fans. I would suggest all of the fans who didn't previously experience a BET with UCONN to withhold their judgement until they see one firsthand. 10,000 drunk middle-aged white guys with long-sleeve t-shirts tucked securely into their carpenter jeans, New Balance 409s squeaking on the polished concrete of MSG, secure in their knowledge that college basketball started around 1992 and Jim Calhoun is basically Jesus Christ with better man-to-man concepts and more capacity for forgiving (his players') sins.
Well, that paints a picture!
It certainly does! I need one for my den. Goes with the other nine for darts!
Gumby, Gumby my man. This is a nice stir, but I hardly think the Huskies need any help in pot stirring. Where is the lub?
As one who hopes for a 12-14 member (ND, S'cuse, and Duke) conference welcome. My only bitch is that UConn isn't private.
None of us newbies are shakin in our boots - bring it! The Muskies wear the black hats around here, so there's competition.
Now, let's hope there is a season to have.
Xudash wrote:gtmoBlue wrote:It certainly does! I need one for my den. Goes with the other nine for darts!
Gumby, Gumby my man. This is a nice stir, but I hardly think the Huskies need any help in pot stirring. Where is the lub?
As one who hopes for a 12-14 member (ND, S'cuse, and Duke) conference welcome. My only bitch is that UConn isn't private.
None of us newbies are shakin in our boots - bring it! The Muskies wear the black hats around here, so there's competition.
Now, let's hope there is a season to have.
gtmo, gtmo - Xavier wears the black hat around here?
GumbyDamnit! wrote:I'm going to make a prediction now...I just have a hunch that the Huskies and the Muskies are going to be must see HLOH forums when games between them heat up.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 42 guests