billyjack wrote:PC needs to go 12-6 in conference at a minimum, meaning we still have to go 6-2 the rest of the way. This has an extremely low probability of happening, cuz we'd have to play .750 ball the rest of the way. I just want my Friars to keep improving and continue to play hard, but i don't expect an NCAA bid at all.
I have no idea how or why our NET can be as low as 55... maybe cuz the Long Beach loss was only by 1 point?
Last night, Pipkins didn't play in the 2nd half, and Alpha seemed to play mad (in a good way), grabbing a ton of key boards. I have no idea why the Jays shot so poorly. Also, we got a lot of 50/50 calls from the refs.
stever20 wrote:billyjack wrote:PC needs to go 12-6 in conference at a minimum, meaning we still have to go 6-2 the rest of the way. This has an extremely low probability of happening, cuz we'd have to play .750 ball the rest of the way. I just want my Friars to keep improving and continue to play hard, but i don't expect an NCAA bid at all.
I have no idea how or why our NET can be as low as 55... maybe cuz the Long Beach loss was only by 1 point?
Last night, Pipkins didn't play in the 2nd half, and Alpha seemed to play mad (in a good way), grabbing a ton of key boards. I have no idea why the Jays shot so poorly. Also, we got a lot of 50/50 calls from the refs.
I completely disagree with you....
PC beats St John's, Georgetown, Xavier, DePaul, and then 1 of Seton Hall/Marquette/Villanova- they are 18-13. With 6 Q1 wins guaranteed- and a 7th in St John's would be possible.... That's an EASY not only get in, but frankly probably in as a 10 seed.
As to why the NET so low-
only 4-7 away from home
13-10 overall record 10.6-9.6 adjusted record
6 losses by 8 or more points
6 of the 13 wins by 5 points or less- with 2 Q3 wins being like that.
billyjack wrote:
Right, i think PC's NET is way better than i would've expected. By "low" i meant "better". i figured our NET at best would be at like 100.
Our losses were bad. Charleston is 8-3 in the Colonial, Penn is decent, but Long Beach has a NET of 305, and Northwestern is bad. URI (road) and Florida (neutral) are fine.
So you think we need 5 more wins and we're a lock? That's still a tough task for us.
stever20 wrote:billyjack wrote:
Right, i think PC's NET is way better than i would've expected. By "low" i meant "better". i figured our NET at best would be at like 100.
Our losses were bad. Charleston is 8-3 in the Colonial, Penn is decent, but Long Beach has a NET of 305, and Northwestern is bad. URI (road) and Florida (neutral) are fine.
So you think we need 5 more wins and we're a lock? That's still a tough task for us.
LOL, this might be the funniest conversation we've ever had on these boards.... Normally we're on the other side... Kind of like a debate club I guess
Why is Providence so high?
#13 overall SOS right now #105 OOC SOS
+0.7 MOV (10 pt capped)
13-10 overall record (10.6-9.6)
Yeah, I totally think 5 wins and Providence is in....
right now have 4 Q1 wins. @ 11 Butler, @ 23 Marquette, 22 Creighton, and @ 67 DePaul(only one that has a real shot to be moved down).
Worst case the 5 wins are 45 Xavier, 67 DePaul, @ 45 Xavier, @ 52 Georgetown, and @ 73 St John's. KP gives PC a 2.0% chance of sweeping those 5. But then you have to figure lose 1 of those 5, but beat Seton Hall 41%, Marquette 49%, or Villanova 24%. Very possible win one of those 3....
So the absolute worst case Providence is 18-13 with 5 Q1 wins. This is assuming DePaul and St John's fall out of the top 75.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 33 guests