Novachap wrote:You know, it happens. Some guys just don't fit, we had our supposed PG of the future in Quinerly, but it just was not meant to be. I thought when Bishop signed with you guys he was a good fit with your program...But, with the quality of guys coming in, I guess he saw the writing on the wall.
Side note, is Xup ok? Haven't seen him around in a while. LOL, just busting chops. I am sure there will be plenty of opportunity for trash talking and using that dry powder when Nova goes to Cintas.
XUFan09 wrote:The Bishop transfer especially hurts because he looked like he was going to be at minimum a reliable 3-and-D guy on the wing, which is really nice to have on your roster. I thought he would play significant minutes next year and start as an upperclassman. At the same time, it's not my college eligibility on the line with these future predictions.
Novachap wrote:Side note, is Xup ok? Haven't seen him around in a while. LOL, just busting chops. I am sure there will be plenty of opportunity for trash talking and using that dry powder when Nova goes to Cintas.
scoscox wrote:XUFan09 wrote:The Bishop transfer especially hurts because he looked like he was going to be at minimum a reliable 3-and-D guy on the wing, which is really nice to have on your roster. I thought he would play significant minutes next year and start as an upperclassman. At the same time, it's not my college eligibility on the line with these future predictions.
3-and-D minus the 3, yea
XUFan09 wrote:I want you to pick the more useful information for a player's shooting ability:
- A high school career where he was a fairly effective shooter, especially with his feet set
- 17 three-point attempts over 10 games while acclimating to D1 ball
I know which one I'd pick as a better predictor of future performance. Bishop is going to end up being at least a decent three-point shooter in the long run.
scoscox wrote:XUFan09 wrote:I want you to pick the more useful information for a player's shooting ability:
- A high school career where he was a fairly effective shooter, especially with his feet set
- 17 three-point attempts over 10 games while acclimating to D1 ball
I know which one I'd pick as a better predictor of future performance. Bishop is going to end up being at least a decent three-point shooter in the long run.
except we have no idea what he actually shot in high school and his form was broken as hell. i'm sure he was better than a 10% shooter, but i'm skeptical of his potential to ever become a good/great shooter
XUFan09 wrote:Committed to St. Joe's. Nova will get to see him play for the next few years.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 22 guests