NET rankings

[Jet915]

Yeah, have a feeling PC will get atleast 5 wins which will probably knock a team or two off the bubble.

[marquette]

That three game stretch of losses to Penn (75-81), Long Beach State (65-66), and Charleston (55-63) will haunt the league. I love Cooley and PC but I will not be supporting PC in any conference games unless MU is competing with DePaul in the final week of the season for a league title.

[GumbyDamnit!]

Proposal for PC:

Throw every conference game. Go 0-18 and we'll let you guys win the BET. Bang. 10 teams dancing.

Brilliant. Who’s got the direct line to Val? Let’s get this done.

[Fieldhouse Flyer]

.
TEAM NET RANKINGS (updated Tuesday December 31, 2019)

4 Butler
17 Villanova
24 Creighton
25 Seton Hall
29 Georgetown

35 Marquette
51 St. John's
52 Xavier

67 DePaul
69 UConn
128 Providence

[Fieldhouse Flyer]

FINAL TEAM NET RANKINGS PRIOR TO THE START OF BIG EAST CONFERENCE GAMES (updated Monday December 30, 2019)

4 Butler
20 Villanova
25 Creighton
30 Georgetown

34 Seton Hall
35 Marquette
39 DePaul
49 St. John's
53 Xavier

70 UConn
129 Providence

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINAL CONFERENCE NET RANKINGS PRIOR TO THE START OF BIG EAST CONFERENCE GAMES (updated Monday December 30, 2019)

1 Big East
2 Big Ten
3 Big 12
4 Pac-12
5 ACC
6 SEC
7 American Athletic
8 Atlantic 10
9 West Coast
10 Missouri Valley

[kayako]

Final NET before the conference games

4 Butler
20 Nova
25 Creighton
30 Georgetown
33 Seton Hall
35 Marquette
39 DePaul
49 SJU
53 Xavier
129 Providence

[stever20]

saw the NET's out for today.... wow...
Xavier was 53 now 52
Nova was 20 now 17
Seton Hall was 33 now 25
DePaul was 39 now 67

Road wins huge in the NET. And home losses are killers. Thought DePaul would drop a bit. but 28 spots?

[Hall2012]

Well last night was quite the "NET" negative for us. The Nova/XU game worked out great - Nova +3 to 17 and X +1 to 52, but WOW DePaul was unreasonably punished for that SHU loss - tanking from 39 to 67. SHU rose 8 spots to #25 with the win.

Maybe there's 50 or so teams grouped so tightly that even the smallest of changes can drop you 28 spots, but until the NCAA decides to be transparent about how it's calculated I can only draw the conclusion that it's a horribly broken system.

[GumbyDamnit!]

Well last night was quite the "NET" negative for us. The Nova/XU game worked out great - Nova +3 to 17 and X +1 to 52, but WOW DePaul was unreasonably punished for that SHU loss - tanking from 39 to 67. SHU rose 8 spots to #25 with the win.

Maybe there's 50 or so teams grouped so tightly that even the smallest of changes can drop you 28 spots, but until the NCAA decides to be transparent about how it's calculated I can only draw the conclusion that it's a horribly broken system.

I think what that tells you is that teams need to defend their home court, and teams that can win on the road will shoot up the NET quickly.

[Hall2012]

Well last night was quite the "NET" negative for us. The Nova/XU game worked out great - Nova +3 to 17 and X +1 to 52, but WOW DePaul was unreasonably punished for that SHU loss - tanking from 39 to 67. SHU rose 8 spots to #25 with the win.

Maybe there's 50 or so teams grouped so tightly that even the smallest of changes can drop you 28 spots, but until the NCAA decides to be transparent about how it's calculated I can only draw the conclusion that it's a horribly broken system.

I think what that tells you is that teams need to defend their home court, and teams that can win on the road will shoot up the NET quickly.

I agree with that, but still think it's incredibly harsh to drop that much for losing (even at home) to a team that was ranked ahead of you to begin with.