yorost wrote:I just see this as prejudice, the same as when people sneer at private schools. So what? They're a closer fit than Richmond (I emphasize Spider fans, great school, better than most of ours, just different in academic structure involving grad school). It's great if we end up with all private, but not if we force it. Being public or private doesn't magically make two schools wildly different.
bluejayfanatic wrote:yorost wrote:I just see this as prejudice, the same as when people sneer at private schools. So what? They're a closer fit than Richmond (I emphasize Spider fans, great school, better than most of ours, just different in academic structure involving grad school). It's great if we end up with all private, but not if we force it. Being public or private doesn't magically make two schools wildly different.
My post made no commentary on whether private schools > public schools. They are structurally different animals and part of what made the original Big East so successful was that it focused on urban, private Catholic schools where basketball was front and center. Creighton just emerged from a mishmash conference of small private schools and large state schools (the MVC). The schools did not share a common purpose, which led to infighting with respect to spending commitments, marketing, and academic aspirations.
The whole point of the new Big East is to align likeminded schools with the same goals. I think the decision to start adding large, publicly funded universities is a mistake and defeats the point of the breakaway.
DudeAnon wrote:Don't get high and mighty, if UConn asked to come back they would welcome them in a minute.
bluejayfanatic wrote:DudeAnon wrote:Don't get high and mighty, if UConn asked to come back they would welcome them in a minute.
Would you say the same for Cincinnati? South Florida? Where does it stop?
Jet915 wrote:The difference between VCU and Butler regarding coaches is that even though Stevens left, Butler was still a very good institutional fit. If Smart leaves, that leaves a school that no longer has their excellent coach and is NOT an institutional fit.
DudeAnon wrote:bluejayfanatic wrote:yorost wrote:I just see this as prejudice, the same as when people sneer at private schools. So what? They're a closer fit than Richmond (I emphasize Spider fans, great school, better than most of ours, just different in academic structure involving grad school). It's great if we end up with all private, but not if we force it. Being public or private doesn't magically make two schools wildly different.
My post made no commentary on whether private schools > public schools. They are structurally different animals and part of what made the original Big East so successful was that it focused on urban, private Catholic schools where basketball was front and center. Creighton just emerged from a mishmash conference of small private schools and large state schools (the MVC). The schools did not share a common purpose, which led to infighting with respect to spending commitments, marketing, and academic aspirations.
The whole point of the new Big East is to align likeminded schools with the same goals. I think the decision to start adding large, publicly funded universities is a mistake and defeats the point of the breakaway.
The point of the breakaway was akin to amputating your leg to stop the infection. The longer they waited, the more screwed the C7 were going to be. Don't get high and mighty, if UConn asked to come back they would welcome them in a minute.
bluejayfanatic wrote:DudeAnon wrote:Don't get high and mighty, if UConn asked to come back they would welcome them in a minute.
Would you say the same for Cincinnati? South Florida? Where does it stop?
bluejayfanatic wrote:DudeAnon wrote:Don't get high and mighty, if UConn asked to come back they would welcome them in a minute.
Would you say the same for Cincinnati? South Florida? Where does it stop?
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 25 guests