MullinMayhem wrote:Our conference has underperformed clearly so far. Coming up short in the big games seemingly 75% of the time. This was supposed to be arguably our best year ever...not a good start.
If you ran a simulation given the Vegas lines (which is how we should be judged), then we'd be where we're currently at. Worst case we'd be a game or two under expectations.
Nova should be 5-1 rather than 4-2, so I'll give you one game there. Xavier is lucky to be 6-1 and should be 5-2. Seton Hall is exactly where they should be (4-1) given they were slight underdogs vs MSU and slight favorites at St. Louis. Those were our top 3 teams this season, and overall they are exactly where they were expected to be. Not exciting as we all wanted to see Seton Hall upset MSU for instance, but on track to make the tournament. They weren't pre-season top 5/10 teams, but rather 10-25 teams which is where they belong unless they overachieve.
As for the rest of the conference, Providence has underperformed but they're offset by DePaul. Everyone else is pretty much doing as expected.
When you take emotion out of it and start looking at expectations vs reality rather than being concerned over what casuals think of us every time Nova loses, then "clearly" becomes a lot less clear. Nobody is mocking Nova for losing to 2 ranked teams. At the end of the season we'll be judged based on how many teams get into the Tournament. Also we'll need to keep at least 2-3 teams in the AP Top 25, which we've done so far.