stever20 wrote:but here's the thing. Even if UConn returns to the Big East- it's not the same thing for UConn. They have no history at all with Xavier, Butler, Creighton- and very little with DePaul and Marquette. I mean for a UConn fan- what's the difference between UConn/Wichita and UConn/Creighton?
I think one thing now is that recruiting overall is a lot more national than it used to be.
Also with Ollie and #8 class- sure great class, but he couldn't coach worth a lick. Hurley a whole hell of a lot better coach than he was.
The Big East is not the optimal conference affiliation for UConn; but (long-term) it is still a more preferential and geographic match than the American. You listed the five programs of the Big East that UConn has little-to-no-history with; fair enough. However, UConn still has Georgetown, Villanova, St. John's, Seton Hall and Providence as historical and geographic rivals. Since you want to stipulate that UConn has "very little" history with Marquette and DePaul (which is very fair, IMO), then you must also stipulate that UConn has that same little-to-no history with Cincinnati and USF, since both joined the Big East all together in 2005. Those five BE programs offer geographic rivals to not only benefit UConn, but also the Olympic sports as well (which the AD is currently spending over $7 million annually in travel budgets).
The interesting thing about institutional-fit for UConn is there are very few institutions like it. It has a $450 million endowment with 30,000 students and a top-60 national ranking. In the B1G, they would be the second smallest university, only to Northwestern (a private school). They would have, by a substantial margin, the lowest endowment in the entire league (where all the B1G schools have endowments in the billions). If you look at the ACC, they would also have the smallest endowment by a significant margin. Since there are a number of private institutions in the ACC, their enrollment numbers would actually be very similar. But, again, their football program carries notorious negative value, and the football-block (Clemson, FSU, Miami, VT, etc.) would most definitely block them long-term. The fact that they have little-to-no football history is another huge barrier. If you look within the American, many of the schools are metropolitan universities, with a mixture of private/public schools with one lone additional Northeast institution (Temple). Regionally and endowment-wise, the University of Delaware has double the endowment that UConn has, and even the University of Vermont has a greater endowment (but, both schools have fewer students). Both schools are also top-100 national universities.
If UConn didn't have football, they would look much closer to the likes of Delaware, Vermont, Maine, UMass and Rhode Island. Football is really what separates UConn from those institutions. However, with exception to UMass, I think there is a very apparent reason why those schools have not pursued FBS Football, and that is due to cost. UMass, like UConn, is currently in an unsustainable model for athletics, especially since it is an independent. At present, UConn views itself as "too good" for the other New England state land-grant institutions, and the power conferences (B1G and ACC) do not view UConn as "good enough" to join their elite exclusive club, hence their present AAC-affiliation.