2018-19 Bracketology Thread

The home for Big East hoops

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby MullinMayhem » Sun Mar 17, 2019 6:53 pm

Agree...I was expecting us to be the popular "wtf why would they pick them" team. Haven't heard a peep. Think SHU got absolutely screwed as a 10 seed. Wins over Maryland and ranked Kentucky, Nova, Marquette, make BET final losing by 2 pts....and a 10 seed? How much more do you have to do? Jesus.

I think we have a punchers chance vs. ASU and Buffalo but zero chance against TT if we make it by some miracle.
MullinMayhem
 
Posts: 784
Joined: Sat May 20, 2017 6:25 pm

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby scoscox » Sun Mar 17, 2019 7:00 pm

Yea I think they got overly punished for mediocre metrics
scoscox
 
Posts: 1349
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2016 1:46 pm

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby herodotus » Sun Mar 17, 2019 7:31 pm

MullinMayhem wrote:Agree...I was expecting us to be the popular "wtf why would they pick them" team. Haven't heard a peep. Think SHU got absolutely screwed as a 10 seed. Wins over Maryland and ranked Kentucky, Nova, Marquette, make BET final losing by 2 pts....and a 10 seed? How much more do you have to do? Jesus.

I think we have a punchers chance vs. ASU and Buffalo but zero chance against TT if we make it by some miracle.


They were in a tough spot. Would you rather them be an 8 or 9, and get killed by Duke? They can beat UK. They'd have not a prayer vs Duke.
herodotus
 
Posts: 315
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2014 8:43 pm

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby kmacker69 » Sun Mar 17, 2019 7:47 pm

Only DePaul left out of the post season, unless they pay to play. ;) 4 NCAA and 5 in NIT.
Lets go Dawgs!
User avatar
kmacker69
 
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:12 pm

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby Jet915 » Sun Mar 17, 2019 7:47 pm

5 Big East NIT teams: Creighton, Xavier, Georgetown, Providence and Butler.
User avatar
Jet915
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby kayako » Sun Mar 17, 2019 7:48 pm

Half the conference made the NIT? That's got to be a modern day record.
supernova
User avatar
kayako
 
Posts: 3836
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 5:22 am

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby stever20 » Mon Mar 18, 2019 11:27 am

I think one major thing this year, and this bodes really well for the big east, is records mattering.

Indiana at 17-15 not making the tourney. Continues a trend where if you are less than 4 games over .500 you don't make the tourney.

So how much did the 20 conference game schedule help Indiana?

I really don't think the Big East has to go 11 to get to 20 conference games.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby kayako » Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:40 pm

stever20 wrote:I really don't think the Big East has to go 11 to get to 20 conference games.


There are benefits of having 1 or 2 more members, but yeah it's silly to expand just to get to 20 games. And it's silly to go 20 games just to keep the double round-robin.
supernova
User avatar
kayako
 
Posts: 3836
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2016 5:22 am

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby adoraz » Mon Mar 18, 2019 12:57 pm

stever20 wrote:I think one major thing this year, and this bodes really well for the big east, is records mattering.

Indiana at 17-15 not making the tourney. Continues a trend where if you are less than 4 games over .500 you don't make the tourney.

So how much did the 20 conference game schedule help Indiana?

I really don't think the Big East has to go 11 to get to 20 conference games.


That, and they also didn't favor NET in the selection process. Would've been rough to see NC State chosen over St. John's. I believe St. John's had the worst NET (and in prior years, RPI) of any at large team in history. In my opinion, the formula relied way too much on margins (a major negative for the Johnnies) and I'm glad they decided to base their decision around whether teams won or lost. Winning and losing always needs to be held in the highest regard.

NC State and Clemson being so far off was telling, as both had great NETs in the 30s but awful RPIs (NC State= 97). No way State should have that much of a discrepancy. St. John's RPI was also in the low 50s with a NET of 73.

For next year, I think they need to settle directly in the middle of RPI and NET. The formula is clearly flawed. Don't punish teams that much simply because they won by 2 points rather than 10, and don't reward teams for blowing out cupcakes.
Johnnies
adoraz
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 5:13 pm

Re: 2018-19 Bracketology Thread

Postby adoraz » Mon Mar 18, 2019 1:07 pm

kayako wrote:
adoraz wrote:WOOOHOOO!!!! Man, that was stressful. Got really concerned seeing teams like Temple and Belmont make it.


Congrats! As soon as Belmont and Temple were announced, I got less confident, but figured that we were probably gonna have to wait for the west region.


Thanks. My guess was Bracket Matrix got all the teams right with one exception: Belmont would replace TCU. Ended up being correct.

That said, I was REALLY nervous after Temple and Belmont were announced. If UNCG was announced in place of either Temple or Belmont, I would have completely given up. UNCG was bad in Q1 games while Belmont was 2-2.
Johnnies
adoraz
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 5:13 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 22 guests

cron