MullinMayhem wrote:The only real criticism our conference has is:
1) Not getting enough teams deep into the tournament consistently (Sweet 16 and beyond)
2) We will keep getting our good coaches poached for the most part because we can't outbid F5 schools
Fair observations, but I would argue that March Madness is full of unpredictability and randomness. One year, you can have a Loyola go on a Cinderella run and advance to the Final Four; another year, Georgetown can run into a buzz saw like FGCU, or Virginia with UMBC. Anything can happen. If you were to play a select March Madness ten times, it's not inconceivable that you could have a multitude of winners. Instead of critiquing teams of how far they get into the tournament consistently, I would present 1) how many bids does the league get in a given year (as the more teams a conference has, the more odds of one of those teams going on a run) and 2) how high those seeds are (again, the odds play into the favor of the higher ranked teams). At present, Villanova, Xavier, Creighton, Butler and Georgetown are the schools that have had a top-4 seed (with Marquette likely to have a top-4 seed this year). However, only Villanova, Butler and Xavier have only made the Sweet 16 or further. It'll take some time, but I am confident that we will have other programs go deep in the coming seasons. Having one season where multiple teams make the Sweet 16 and/or beyond is the leagues next goal, IMO. It is quite possible that it could be this year (with Villanova and Marquette), but anything can happen in the next six weeks.
Regarding the poaching of our coaches, we have had Buzz (Virginia Tech), Holtmann (Ohio State), and Mack (Louisville) leave their respective positions. However, McDermott was pursued by Ohio State, he turned them down. Allegedly, Willard was pursued by Pittsburgh, he turned them down. I believe UConn sent feelers out to Cooley, and he turned them down. Wright routinely gets pursued for NBA-level gigs, he turns those down. Coaches do not stay forever, whether you are at Butler or North Carolina. The strength (and beauty) of our programs is that we are defined by a collection of coaches and have created sustained success. That is not on the cusp of changing any time soon. It will be very interesting to see how some programs (like Syracuse and Duke) evolve without their legendary, hall-of-fame coaches. They can quite possibly sustain that success, or they can morph into a version of Indiana/UCLA (schools that were once at the top of the mountain, but have failed to regain past glory).