anXUfan wrote:Blocked him a long time ago and have not regretted it.
stever20 wrote:no doubt the AAC didn't get good results out of their draw. But they were on the other hand real close to having a draw with Houston in the west region without top 3 seeds and 4 seed Gonzaga getting beat by Florida St- and Cincy in the South where 1,3,4,5,6 were all out early, and 5 seed Kentucky getting beat by Kansas St. They were close to having a chance to have a Houston/Cincy national semifinal game.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:stever20 wrote:no doubt the AAC didn't get good results out of their draw. But they were on the other hand real close to having a draw with Houston in the west region without top 3 seeds and 4 seed Gonzaga getting beat by Florida St- and Cincy in the South where 1,3,4,5,6 were all out early, and 5 seed Kentucky getting beat by Kansas St. They were close to having a chance to have a Houston/Cincy national semifinal game.
Holy crap. Everyone on this board needs to re-read this several times... In reality both teams lost in the R32. In Stever’s mind both just missed playing in the FF against each other. I mean where do you go from a comment like that? That speaks directly to his abject dillusions about the AAC. It would be akin to us saying that Creighton just missed on the FF had they beaten KSU. You can’t reason or debate this level of thinking. The best you can do is hope a shiny object gets his attention and takes him away from this self-imposed embarrassment.
Wow. No other words...just: wow. I think we’re done here.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:stever20 wrote:no doubt the AAC didn't get good results out of their draw. But they were on the other hand real close to having a draw with Houston in the west region without top 3 seeds and 4 seed Gonzaga getting beat by Florida St- and Cincy in the South where 1,3,4,5,6 were all out early, and 5 seed Kentucky getting beat by Kansas St. They were close to having a chance to have a Houston/Cincy national semifinal game.
Holy crap. Everyone on this board needs to re-read this several times... In reality both teams lost in the R32. In Stever’s mind both just missed playing in the FF against each other. I mean where do you go from a comment like that? That speaks directly to his abject dillusions about the AAC. It would be akin to us saying that Creighton just missed on the FF had they beaten KSU. You can’t reason or debate this level of thinking. The best you can do is hope a shiny object gets his attention and takes him away from this self-imposed embarrassment.
Wow. No other words...just: wow. I think we’re done here.
stever20 wrote:Savannah Jay wrote:stever20 wrote:Loyola is a great story. BUT top 6 seeds make the elite 8 so much- 233 top 6 seeds to 39 sub 6 seeds- that it just shows how much the odds are skewed for the top 6 seeds.....
even sweet 16- it's 422 top 6 seeds to only 122 sub 6 seeds. So a difference of about 3.5 to 1.
11 seeds are great, if you don't have to go to Dayton. But there's maybe 1 of those each year.
I think the Big East would have been better off if Seton Hall had beaten Butler in the BET, and Seton Hall now instead of a 8 seed is a 6 seed. Even if that costs Butler their bid. Seton Hall as a 6 could have done some serious damage. But being an 8, they had an extreme uphill battle. I think the A10 showed it some even themselves this year. A10 with URI as a 6 seed(very possible with A10 win) and no Davidson much better off in having a real shot than A10 with URI as a 7 seed(seeing Duke) and Davidson as a 12 seed(seeing Kentucky).
Extra teams may be lottery tickets, but those lottery tickets are like powerball tickets. Call me risk adverse, but I'd rather have a stronger team like Seton Hall with a higher seed than getting an extra team in, but hampering the stronger teams chance of making a run.
I think you are common sense averse...what would have happened if we only got three teams in the tournament? Let's just say they were all top 6 seeds. And just for discussion purposes, those seeds were a 2, 4, and 6. Those seem like good seeds poised for a nice run, no? But, as we know, getting only three teams in with good seeds isn't even a guarantee of one sweet sixteen team, is it?
no doubt the AAC didn't get good results out of their draw. But they were on the other hand real close to having a draw with Houston in the west region without top 3 seeds and 4 seed Gonzaga getting beat by Florida St- and Cincy in the South where 1,3,4,5,6 were all out early, and 5 seed Kentucky getting beat by Kansas St. They were close to having a chance to have a Houston/Cincy national semifinal game.
GumbyDamnit! wrote:stever20 wrote:no doubt the AAC didn't get good results out of their draw. But they were on the other hand real close to having a draw with Houston in the west region without top 3 seeds and 4 seed Gonzaga getting beat by Florida St- and Cincy in the South where 1,3,4,5,6 were all out early, and 5 seed Kentucky getting beat by Kansas St. They were close to having a chance to have a Houston/Cincy national semifinal game.
Holy crap. Everyone on this board needs to re-read this several times... In reality both teams lost in the R32. In Stever’s mind both just missed playing in the FF against each other. I mean where do you go from a comment like that? That speaks directly to his abject dillusions about the AAC. It would be akin to us saying that Creighton just missed on the FF had they beaten KSU. You can’t reason or debate this level of thinking. The best you can do is hope a shiny object gets his attention and takes him away from this self-imposed embarrassment.
Wow. No other words...just: wow. I think we’re done here.
At the next home game, Creighton will be unveiling our "Almost Final Four" banner. Who knew that you didn't actually have to win these games to take credit. We're so proud!!GumbyDamnit! wrote:It would be akin to us saying that Creighton just missed on the FF had they beaten KSU.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests