Page 1 of 1

(3) Wednesday Non-Con Games 12/6/23

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2023 8:38 am
by MUPanther
Sacred Heart at St. John's, CBSSN, 7pm -Tom McCarthy and Jay Wright
Line: St.John's -20/158

12 Texas at 8 Marquette, FS1, 8pm, pregame at 7:30- Jason Bennati, Bill Raftery
Line: Marquette -7.5/146.5

DePaul at 21 Texas A&M, SECN, 8:30PM -Dave Neal and Mark Wise
Line: Texas A&M -18.5/146

Re: (3) Wednesday Non-Con Games 12/6/23

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2023 9:11 am
by stever20
league is going to need to go on a run here to end OOC play to feel good about itself. by my count already 31 OOC losses. Had 38 looking last year all year long.

UConn sill with Gonzaga
Creighton still with Alabama
Marquette with Texas tonight
Georgetown with Syracuse and Notre Dame left
Seton Hall wih Rutgers and Missouri left
Nova with UCLA left
Xavier with Cincy left
DePaul with Texas A&M tonight and still Northwestern

that's like 11 tougher games left.

Re: (3) Wednesday Non-Con Games 12/6/23

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2023 10:46 am
by hoops22
At this point I just want the Non- Con Games to end before any more damage is done. I was expecting a Big 12 type year with four elite teams and another three or four being tournament bound. I never expected this many ugly losses. On the bright side, the top three look really good and all seem capable of making a deep run come March. Lets just hope they have some company when tournament time rolls around.

Re: (3) Wednesday Non-Con Games 12/6/23

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2023 9:52 pm
by Jet915
Marquette taking Texas to the woodshed and Depaul needs to cancel their season :?

Re: (3) Wednesday Non-Con Games 12/6/23

PostPosted: Wed Dec 06, 2023 10:11 pm
by Demon22
A&M averaged 2.1 points per possession in the first half.

I've never heard of something like that.

We could have allowed them an uncontested layup every time down the court, and it would have been more effective.

Re: (3) Wednesday Non-Con Games 12/6/23

PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2023 10:08 am
by stever20
Demon22 wrote:A&M averaged 2.1 points per possession in the first half.

I've never heard of something like that.

We could have allowed them an uncontested layup every time down the court, and it would have been more effective.


I don't think I've ever heard of anything like that.